2014Building AcousticsRequires access

Comparison of Hanging Panels and Boundary Diffusers in a Reverberation Chamber

David Bradley, Markus Müller-Trapet, Jacob Adelgren, Michael Vorländer

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Achieving a diffuse sound field in a reverberation chamber is crucial for measurements of acoustic quantities such as sound absorption coefficient, scattering coefficient, and sound power level. Toward this aim, diffusing elements such as hanging panels or rotating diffusers are typically installed in the chamber. However, previous research has suggested that hanging panels violate certain theoretical assumptions regarding diffusivity. Also, rotating diffusers cause the chamber to be a time-variant system, precluding the use of some measurement approaches such as sine-sweep integrated impulse response techniques. Boundary diffusers are offered as an alternative in the current study. The effects of both hanging panels and boundary diffusers on sound field diffusivity in a scale reverberation chamber are systematically and comparatively analyzed. The field diffusivity is characterized based on the guidelines set forth in American and international standards, including ISO 354, ASTM C423, and ASTM E90. Resulting data suggests that these standardized methods do not adequately or rigorously quantify diffusivity. The relative effectiveness of hanging diffusers vs. boundary diffusers will be discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Achieving a diffuse sound field in a reverberation chamber is crucial for measurements of acoustic quantities such as sound absorption coefficient, scattering coefficient, and sound power level. Toward this aim, diffusing elements such as hanging panels or rotating diffusers are typically installed in the chamber. However, previous research has suggested that hanging panels violate certain theoretical assumptions regarding diffusivity. Also, rotating diffusers cause the chamber to be a time-variant system, precluding the use of some measurement approaches such as sine-sweep integrated impulse response techniques. Boundary diffusers are offered as an alternative in the current study. The effects of both hanging panels and boundary diffusers on sound field diffusivity in a scale reverberation chamber are systematically and comparatively analyzed. The field diffusivity is characterized based on the guidelines set forth in American and international standards, including ISO 354, ASTM C423, and ASTM E90. Resulting data suggests that these standardized methods do not adequately or rigorously quantify diffusivity. The relative effectiveness of hanging diffusers vs. boundary diffusers will be discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Achieving a diffuse sound field in a reverberation chamber is crucial for measurements of acoustic quantities such as sound absorption coefficient, scattering coefficient, and sound power level. Toward this aim, diffusing elements such as hanging panels or rotating diffusers are typically installed in the chamber. However, previous research has suggested that hanging panels violate certain theoretical assumptions regarding diffusivity. Also, rotating diffusers cause the chamber to be a time-variant system, precluding the use of some measurement approaches such as sine-sweep integrated impulse response techniques. Boundary diffusers are offered as an alternative in the current study. The effects of both hanging panels and boundary diffusers on sound field diffusivity in a scale reverberation chamber are systematically and comparatively analyzed. The field diffusivity is characterized based on the guidelines set forth in American and international standards, including ISO 354, ASTM C423, and ASTM E90. Resulting data suggests that these standardized methods do not adequately or rigorously quantify diffusivity. The relative effectiveness of hanging diffusers vs. boundary diffusers will be discussed.

Key concepts: Electromagnetic reverberation chamber, Acoustics, Reverberation, Sound power, Thermal diffusivity, Impulse (physics), Architectural acoustics, Impulse response

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Hanging Panels and Boundary Diffusers in a Reverberation Chamber — Research Paper | ScholarLens