2003Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyOpen access

Statistical interpretation of Large Magellanic Cloud microlensing candidates

S. Rahvar

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

After a decade of gravitational microlensing experiments, a dozen microlensing candidates in the direction of the stars of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) have been detected by the EROS and MACHO groups. Recently it was shown that the distribution of the duration of the observed LMC microlensing events is significantly narrower than what is expected from the standard halo model. In this article we make the same comparison, using non-standard halo models and considering the contribution of non-halo components of the Milky Way such as the disc, spheroid and the LMC itself in the microlensing events. Comparing the theoretical and experimental widths of the distribution of the duration of events shows that neither standard nor non-standard halo models are compatible with the microlensing data at least with 95 per cent confidence. These results may be explained if (i) the MACHOs in the Galactic halo reside in clumpy structures or (ii) the durations of events have been underestimated due to the blending effect.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After a decade of gravitational microlensing experiments, a dozen microlensing candidates in the direction of the stars of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) have been detected by the EROS and MACHO groups. Recently it was shown that the distribution of the duration of the observed LMC microlensing events is significantly narrower than what is expected from the standard halo model. In this article we make the same comparison, using non-standard halo models and considering the contribution of non-halo components of the Milky Way such as the disc, spheroid and the LMC itself in the microlensing events. Comparing the theoretical and experimental widths of the distribution of the duration of events shows that neither standard nor non-standard halo models are compatible with the microlensing data at least with 95 per cent confidence. These results may be explained if (i) the MACHOs in the Galactic halo reside in clumpy structures or (ii) the durations of events have been underestimated due to the blending effect.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After a decade of gravitational microlensing experiments, a dozen microlensing candidates in the direction of the stars of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) have been detected by the EROS and MACHO groups. Recently it was shown that the distribution of the duration of the observed LMC microlensing events is significantly narrower than what is expected from the standard halo model. In this article we make the same comparison, using non-standard halo models and considering the contribution of non-halo components of the Milky Way such as the disc, spheroid and the LMC itself in the microlensing events. Comparing the theoretical and experimental widths of the distribution of the duration of events shows that neither standard nor non-standard halo models are compatible with the microlensing data at least with 95 per cent confidence. These results may be explained if (i) the MACHOs in the Galactic halo reside in clumpy structures or (ii) the durations of events have been underestimated due to the blending effect.

Key concepts: Gravitational microlensing, Physics, Large Magellanic Cloud, Halo, Astrophysics, Milky Way, Galactic halo, Gravitational lens

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Statistical interpretation of Large Magellanic Cloud microlensing candidates — Research Paper | ScholarLens