Impact of restenosis 10 years after coronary angioplasty
Christine Espinola–Klein
Abstract
Christine Espinola–Klein
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the 10-year follow-up results of patients with or without restenosis following single-vessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 313 patients with successful PTCA (> or = 20% reduction in luminal diameter narrowing without acute complications) and a control angiography 6 months after PTCA were included in the study. Events during the follow-up period were defined as death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, or repeat PTCA. Statistical evaluation was performed by the Fisher test, logistic regression, and life-table analysis. Restenosis (loss of > 50% of the initial gain and diameter stenosis of 50%) was found in 87 (28%) patients. During follow-up, 11 patients (5%) without restenosis (group A) and 11 (13%) patients with restenosis (group B) died (P < 0.05). In group A, 17 (8%) patients and in group B, 11 (13%) patients suffered myocardial infarction (ns); 17 group A (8%) patients and 25 (29%) group B patients had bypass surgery (P < 0.0001), and 34 (15%) group A patients and 55 (63%) group B patients underwent repeat PTCA (P < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis identified restenosis as an independent risk factor that increases the risk of death 2.8-fold (P = 0.02), bypass surgery 5.6-fold (P < 0.0001), and repeat PTCA 10-fold (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that patients with restenosis had a poorer long-term outcome than patients without restenosis. Although most patients with restenosis underwent repeat PTCA, the survival rate without any serious adverse events was only 59%, compared with 83% in patients without restenosis (P < 0.0001).
OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the 10-year follow-up results of patients with or without restenosis following single-vessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 313 patients with successful PTCA (> or = 20% reduction in luminal diameter narrowing without acute complications) and a control angiography 6 months after PTCA were included in the study. Events during the follow-up period were defined as death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, or repeat PTCA. Statistical evaluation was performed by the Fisher test, logistic regression, and life-table analysis. Restenosis (loss of > 50% of the initial gain and diameter stenosis of 50%) was found in 87 (28%) patients. During follow-up, 11 patients (5%) without restenosis (group A) and 11 (13%) patients with restenosis (group B) died (P < 0.05). In group A, 17 (8%) patients and in group B, 11 (13%) patients suffered myocardial infarction (ns); 17 group A (8%) patients and 25 (29%) group B patients had bypass surgery (P < 0.0001), and 34 (15%) group A patients and 55 (63%) group B patients underwent repeat PTCA (P < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis identified restenosis as an independent risk factor that increases the risk of death 2.8-fold (P = 0.02), bypass surgery 5.6-fold (P < 0.0001), and repeat PTCA 10-fold (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that patients with restenosis had a poorer long-term outcome than patients without restenosis. Although most patients with restenosis underwent repeat PTCA, the survival rate without any serious adverse events was only 59%, compared with 83% in patients without restenosis (P < 0.0001).
Key concepts: Medicine, Restenosis, Cardiology, Bypass surgery, Myocardial infarction, Internal medicine, Angioplasty, Stenosis