2010Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesRequires access

Comment on Makarieva et al . ‘A critique of some modern applications of the Carnot heat engine concept: the dissipative heat engine cannot exist’

M. Bister, Nilton O. Renno, Olivier M. Pauluis, Kerry Emanuel

Open publisher page 39 citations

Abstract

Makarieva et al . (2010) assert that a dissipative heat engine is impossible and criticize earlier published work that they claim violates the laws of thermodynamics. Here we show that the earlier work does not violate fundamental physical laws and suggest that Makarieva et al . (2010) were misinterpreting expressions for wind speed as ones for work done on external objects. Moreover, we dispute their assertion that dissipative heating is necessarily compensated by a reduction of external heating.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Makarieva et al . (2010) assert that a dissipative heat engine is impossible and criticize earlier published work that they claim violates the laws of thermodynamics. Here we show that the earlier work does not violate fundamental physical laws and suggest that Makarieva et al . (2010) were misinterpreting expressions for wind speed as ones for work done on external objects. Moreover, we dispute their assertion that dissipative heating is necessarily compensated by a reduction of external heating.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Makarieva et al . (2010) assert that a dissipative heat engine is impossible and criticize earlier published work that they claim violates the laws of thermodynamics. Here we show that the earlier work does not violate fundamental physical laws and suggest that Makarieva et al . (2010) were misinterpreting expressions for wind speed as ones for work done on external objects. Moreover, we dispute their assertion that dissipative heating is necessarily compensated by a reduction of external heating.

Key concepts: Dissipative system, Carnot cycle, Heat engine, Work (physics), Assertion, Second law of thermodynamics, Physics, Theoretical physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comment on Makarieva et al . ‘A critique of some modern applications of the Carnot heat engine concept: the dissipative heat engine cannot exist’ — Research Paper | ScholarLens