Comment on Makarieva et al . ‘A critique of some modern applications of the Carnot heat engine concept: the dissipative heat engine cannot exist’
M. Bister, Nilton O. Renno, Olivier M. Pauluis, Kerry Emanuel
Abstract
M. Bister, Nilton O. Renno, Olivier M. Pauluis, Kerry Emanuel
Abstract
Makarieva et al . (2010) assert that a dissipative heat engine is impossible and criticize earlier published work that they claim violates the laws of thermodynamics. Here we show that the earlier work does not violate fundamental physical laws and suggest that Makarieva et al . (2010) were misinterpreting expressions for wind speed as ones for work done on external objects. Moreover, we dispute their assertion that dissipative heating is necessarily compensated by a reduction of external heating.
OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Makarieva et al . (2010) assert that a dissipative heat engine is impossible and criticize earlier published work that they claim violates the laws of thermodynamics. Here we show that the earlier work does not violate fundamental physical laws and suggest that Makarieva et al . (2010) were misinterpreting expressions for wind speed as ones for work done on external objects. Moreover, we dispute their assertion that dissipative heating is necessarily compensated by a reduction of external heating.
Key concepts: Dissipative system, Carnot cycle, Heat engine, Work (physics), Assertion, Second law of thermodynamics, Physics, Theoretical physics