1992•LethaiaRequires access

Relationships of the dog‐like marsupials, deltatheroidans and early tribosphenic mammals

Larry G. Marshall, Zofia Kielan‐Jaworowska

Open publisher page 44 citations

Abstract

A cladistic analysis of the major groups of early metatherian mammals shows that the Deltatheroida and South American dog-like Borhyaenoidea are closely related and are placed in a new supercohort Deltatheralia. while all other metatherians are placed in the supercohort Marsupialia. A reassessment of Early Cretaceous mammals with tribosphenic molars shows that metatherians and eutherians apparently evolved independently from a peramuran-like ancestor, and an entoconid. distinctly basined talonid and large protocone were acquired separately in each group. Consequently. the Tribosphenida (sensu McKenna) is apparently paraphyletic. Aegialodontia are regarded as structurally ancestral to Metatheria but not Eutheria. The known fossil record supports the view that differentation of the stocks which gave rise to metatherians and eutherians apparently occurred in Late Jurassic or Early Cretaceous time.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A cladistic analysis of the major groups of early metatherian mammals shows that the Deltatheroida and South American dog-like Borhyaenoidea are closely related and are placed in a new supercohort Deltatheralia. while all other metatherians are placed in the supercohort Marsupialia. A reassessment of Early Cretaceous mammals with tribosphenic molars shows that metatherians and eutherians apparently evolved independently from a peramuran-like ancestor, and an entoconid. distinctly basined talonid and large protocone were acquired separately in each group. Consequently. the Tribosphenida (sensu McKenna) is apparently paraphyletic. Aegialodontia are regarded as structurally ancestral to Metatheria but not Eutheria. The known fossil record supports the view that differentation of the stocks which gave rise to metatherians and eutherians apparently occurred in Late Jurassic or Early Cretaceous time.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A cladistic analysis of the major groups of early metatherian mammals shows that the Deltatheroida and South American dog-like Borhyaenoidea are closely related and are placed in a new supercohort Deltatheralia. while all other metatherians are placed in the supercohort Marsupialia. A reassessment of Early Cretaceous mammals with tribosphenic molars shows that metatherians and eutherians apparently evolved independently from a peramuran-like ancestor, and an entoconid. distinctly basined talonid and large protocone were acquired separately in each group. Consequently. the Tribosphenida (sensu McKenna) is apparently paraphyletic. Aegialodontia are regarded as structurally ancestral to Metatheria but not Eutheria. The known fossil record supports the view that differentation of the stocks which gave rise to metatherians and eutherians apparently occurred in Late Jurassic or Early Cretaceous time.

Key concepts: Eutheria, Theria, Paraphyly, Cladistics, Cretaceous, Marsupial, Biology, Zoology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relationships of the dog‐like marsupials, deltatheroidans and early tribosphenic mammals — Research Paper | ScholarLens