2010Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi DergisiRequires access

Detection of Brucella Antibody and DNA in Cow Milk by ELISA and PCR Methods

Göknur Terzi, Özlem Büyüktanır, Oktay Genç, Ali Gücükoğlu, Nevzat Yurdusev

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Summary The aim of the present study was to determine comparatively the presence of anti-Brucella antibody and Brucella DNA in cow milk. Anti-Brucella antibody was detected by ELISA based on the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as diagnostic antigen. Besides, the presence of Brucella DNA in milk samples was screened by eryCD gene-targeted PCR and B. abortus DNA was determined by amplification of alkB genes. For this purpose, 70 raw cow milk samples collected from open markets were used. Among these samples, 15 samples (21.4%) were found positive for anti-Brucella LPS antibody in ELISA. In contrast, only 5 milk samples (7.1%) were determined as positive by eryCD gene-targeted PCR. All of the eryCD positive samples giving an amplicon of 904 bp indicated the presence of wildtype Brucella DNA but not B. abortus S19 vaccine strain allowing amplification of only an amplicon of 202 bp. In addition, amplification of the alkB gene demonstrated the presence of B. abortus DNA in 5 eryCD positive samples. No statistical agreement was observed between ELISA and PCR results with 95% confidence interval. These results strongly suggest that use of both ELISA and PCR methods could lead to more reliable diagnosis of brucellosis from bovine milk samples.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary The aim of the present study was to determine comparatively the presence of anti-Brucella antibody and Brucella DNA in cow milk. Anti-Brucella antibody was detected by ELISA based on the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as diagnostic antigen. Besides, the presence of Brucella DNA in milk samples was screened by eryCD gene-targeted PCR and B. abortus DNA was determined by amplification of alkB genes. For this purpose, 70 raw cow milk samples collected from open markets were used. Among these samples, 15 samples (21.4%) were found positive for anti-Brucella LPS antibody in ELISA. In contrast, only 5 milk samples (7.1%) were determined as positive by eryCD gene-targeted PCR. All of the eryCD positive samples giving an amplicon of 904 bp indicated the presence of wildtype Brucella DNA but not B. abortus S19 vaccine strain allowing amplification of only an amplicon of 202 bp. In addition, amplification of the alkB gene demonstrated the presence of B. abortus DNA in 5 eryCD positive samples. No statistical agreement was observed between ELISA and PCR results with 95% confidence interval. These results strongly suggest that use of both ELISA and PCR methods could lead to more reliable diagnosis of brucellosis from bovine milk samples.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary The aim of the present study was to determine comparatively the presence of anti-Brucella antibody and Brucella DNA in cow milk. Anti-Brucella antibody was detected by ELISA based on the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as diagnostic antigen. Besides, the presence of Brucella DNA in milk samples was screened by eryCD gene-targeted PCR and B. abortus DNA was determined by amplification of alkB genes. For this purpose, 70 raw cow milk samples collected from open markets were used. Among these samples, 15 samples (21.4%) were found positive for anti-Brucella LPS antibody in ELISA. In contrast, only 5 milk samples (7.1%) were determined as positive by eryCD gene-targeted PCR. All of the eryCD positive samples giving an amplicon of 904 bp indicated the presence of wildtype Brucella DNA but not B. abortus S19 vaccine strain allowing amplification of only an amplicon of 202 bp. In addition, amplification of the alkB gene demonstrated the presence of B. abortus DNA in 5 eryCD positive samples. No statistical agreement was observed between ELISA and PCR results with 95% confidence interval. These results strongly suggest that use of both ELISA and PCR methods could lead to more reliable diagnosis of brucellosis from bovine milk samples.

Key concepts: Brucella, Amplicon, Raw milk, AlkB, Brucellosis, Biology, Antibody, Polymerase chain reaction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Detection of Brucella Antibody and DNA in Cow Milk by ELISA and PCR Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens