2010Ecological RestorationRequires access

Linking Geomorphological and Ecological Responses in Restored Urban Pool-Riffle Streams

Anne Chin, Frances P. Gelwick, David Laurencio, Laura R. Laurencio, Morgan S. Byars, Mateo Scoggins

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Little attention has been focused on evaluating river restoration projects. Postproject assessments commonly identify improvements in biological or physical conditions, but opportunities for understanding the interactions between such processes are often missed. This study assesses the linkages between geomorphological and ecological responses in three stream channels in Austin, Texas, restored since 1998 with riffles and steps and riparian planting along graded banks. Prerestoration topographic surveys and data for habitat and macroinvertebrate characteristics enabled comparisons with postrestoration conditions in 2007. Results showed increased channel widths and depths, leading to larger cross-sectional areas and inferred lowered velocities and unit stream power. Improvements in habitats included greater bank stability, less channel alteration, and more diverse velocity-depth regimes. Changes in functional feeding groups of macroinvertebrate communities were reflected in metrics of the Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity, including greater percentages of grazers, filterers, and collector-gatherers in the restored streams. A multivariate statistical model, redundancy analysis, linked improvement in key ecological response variables (taxa richness, % EPT, % grazers, and % chironomids) to better conditions in habitats (lower embeddedness, greater epifaunal cover, greater riparian vegetative width, and more velocity-depth regimes). Key explanatory changes in physical characteristics were increased cross-sectional area and decreased average velocity, which were attributed to restoration designs. These results suggest that although the main restoration goals were to stabilize eroding channels, improvements in physical characteristics could nevertheless lead to positive ecological outcomes. These findings suggest the potential of integrated approaches to target both physical and biological improvements in future restoration projects

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Little attention has been focused on evaluating river restoration projects. Postproject assessments commonly identify improvements in biological or physical conditions, but opportunities for understanding the interactions between such processes are often missed. This study assesses the linkages between geomorphological and ecological responses in three stream channels in Austin, Texas, restored since 1998 with riffles and steps and riparian planting along graded banks. Prerestoration topographic surveys and data for habitat and macroinvertebrate characteristics enabled comparisons with postrestoration conditions in 2007. Results showed increased channel widths and depths, leading to larger cross-sectional areas and inferred lowered velocities and unit stream power. Improvements in habitats included greater bank stability, less channel alteration, and more diverse velocity-depth regimes. Changes in functional feeding groups of macroinvertebrate communities were reflected in metrics of the Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity, including greater percentages of grazers, filterers, and collector-gatherers in the restored streams. A multivariate statistical model, redundancy analysis, linked improvement in key ecological response variables (taxa richness, % EPT, % grazers, and % chironomids) to better conditions in habitats (lower embeddedness, greater epifaunal cover, greater riparian vegetative width, and more velocity-depth regimes). Key explanatory changes in physical characteristics were increased cross-sectional area and decreased average velocity, which were attributed to restoration designs. These results suggest that although the main restoration goals were to stabilize eroding channels, improvements in physical characteristics could nevertheless lead to positive ecological outcomes. These findings suggest the potential of integrated approaches to target both physical and biological improvements in future restoration projects

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Little attention has been focused on evaluating river restoration projects. Postproject assessments commonly identify improvements in biological or physical conditions, but opportunities for understanding the interactions between such processes are often missed. This study assesses the linkages between geomorphological and ecological responses in three stream channels in Austin, Texas, restored since 1998 with riffles and steps and riparian planting along graded banks. Prerestoration topographic surveys and data for habitat and macroinvertebrate characteristics enabled comparisons with postrestoration conditions in 2007. Results showed increased channel widths and depths, leading to larger cross-sectional areas and inferred lowered velocities and unit stream power. Improvements in habitats included greater bank stability, less channel alteration, and more diverse velocity-depth regimes. Changes in functional feeding groups of macroinvertebrate communities were reflected in metrics of the Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity, including greater percentages of grazers, filterers, and collector-gatherers in the restored streams. A multivariate statistical model, redundancy analysis, linked improvement in key ecological response variables (taxa richness, % EPT, % grazers, and % chironomids) to better conditions in habitats (lower embeddedness, greater epifaunal cover, greater riparian vegetative width, and more velocity-depth regimes). Key explanatory changes in physical characteristics were increased cross-sectional area and decreased average velocity, which were attributed to restoration designs. These results suggest that although the main restoration goals were to stabilize eroding channels, improvements in physical characteristics could nevertheless lead to positive ecological outcomes. These findings suggest the potential of integrated approaches to target both physical and biological improvements in future restoration projects

Key concepts: Riffle, STREAMS, Chin, Geography, Ecology, Archaeology, Geology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Linking Geomorphological and Ecological Responses in Restored Urban Pool-Riffle Streams — Research Paper | ScholarLens