1968Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical EngineersRequires access

Evaluation of some aspects of relativity

L. Essen

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

If the relativity theory is to predict experimental results about the rates of clocks, the time intervals must be defined in such a way that they are capable of measurement. When this is done the confusion which has been associated with the theory is explained. The theory is shown to be self-consistent up to a point, but an error is then made in the course of a ‘thought experiment’. The result given does not follow from the ‘experiment’ but from an additional assumption made implicitly. The same kind of error is made in the ‘thought experiments’ in Einstein's later papers. The results again follow from implicit assumptions and not from the ‘experiments’. His final assumptions that time dilatation is a consequence of acceleration or gravitational potential are supported by the results of recent experiments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

If the relativity theory is to predict experimental results about the rates of clocks, the time intervals must be defined in such a way that they are capable of measurement. When this is done the confusion which has been associated with the theory is explained. The theory is shown to be self-consistent up to a point, but an error is then made in the course of a ‘thought experiment’. The result given does not follow from the ‘experiment’ but from an additional assumption made implicitly. The same kind of error is made in the ‘thought experiments’ in Einstein's later papers. The results again follow from implicit assumptions and not from the ‘experiments’. His final assumptions that time dilatation is a consequence of acceleration or gravitational potential are supported by the results of recent experiments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

If the relativity theory is to predict experimental results about the rates of clocks, the time intervals must be defined in such a way that they are capable of measurement. When this is done the confusion which has been associated with the theory is explained. The theory is shown to be self-consistent up to a point, but an error is then made in the course of a ‘thought experiment’. The result given does not follow from the ‘experiment’ but from an additional assumption made implicitly. The same kind of error is made in the ‘thought experiments’ in Einstein's later papers. The results again follow from implicit assumptions and not from the ‘experiments’. His final assumptions that time dilatation is a consequence of acceleration or gravitational potential are supported by the results of recent experiments.

Key concepts: Theory of relativity, Confusion, Einstein, Theoretical physics, Point (geometry), Acceleration, Calculus (dental), Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of some aspects of relativity — Research Paper | ScholarLens