1992Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica ScandinavicaRequires access

Monitoring endometrial adenocarcinoma with a four tumor marker combination: CA125, squarnous cell carcinoma antigen, CA19.9 and CA15.3

Roberto Matorras, Francisco J Rodrı́guez-Escudero, Javier Dı́ez, J Genollá, J.C. Fombellida, Álvaro Ruibal

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The combined value of four tumor markers, in the follow-up of endometrial adenocarcinoma, is analyzed. Cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA 19.9) and carbohydrate antigen 15.3 (CA 15.3) were used in 213 evaluations from 105 patients. Sensitivity as regards recurrence or progression of disease was 45% (CA 125), 9% (SCC), 51% (CA 19.9) and 21% (CA 15.3). Specificities as regards the 'no evidence of disease' ranged from 95% to 99%. Single tumor marker efficiency ranged from 90% for CA 125 to 84% for SCC (p = 0.08). With the two tumor marker combination sensitivity increased up to 77% achieved with CA 125-CA 19.9, but efficiency increased only slightly (92.0% for CA 125-SCC). In the best three tumor marker combination, a sensitivity of 85% was achieved (CA 125-CA 19.9-CA 15.3), and an efficiency of 92.2%. The simultaneous use of the four tumor markers did not improve assay results. The possibility of recurrence or progression of disease in some combinations was very low (4.6% when CA 125 and CA 19.9 negative, 3% when CA 125, CA 19.9 and CA 15.3 negative), a fact to be considered in order to avoid aggressive management in such cases. The tumor markers were of limited value for the prediction of recurrences. The suggestion of recurrence when the increase in tumor markers was the only finding was confirmed in only 7%, while confirmation was made in 100% when there was another pathological finding.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The combined value of four tumor markers, in the follow-up of endometrial adenocarcinoma, is analyzed. Cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA 19.9) and carbohydrate antigen 15.3 (CA 15.3) were used in 213 evaluations from 105 patients. Sensitivity as regards recurrence or progression of disease was 45% (CA 125), 9% (SCC), 51% (CA 19.9) and 21% (CA 15.3). Specificities as regards the 'no evidence of disease' ranged from 95% to 99%. Single tumor marker efficiency ranged from 90% for CA 125 to 84% for SCC (p = 0.08). With the two tumor marker combination sensitivity increased up to 77% achieved with CA 125-CA 19.9, but efficiency increased only slightly (92.0% for CA 125-SCC). In the best three tumor marker combination, a sensitivity of 85% was achieved (CA 125-CA 19.9-CA 15.3), and an efficiency of 92.2%. The simultaneous use of the four tumor markers did not improve assay results. The possibility of recurrence or progression of disease in some combinations was very low (4.6% when CA 125 and CA 19.9 negative, 3% when CA 125, CA 19.9 and CA 15.3 negative), a fact to be considered in order to avoid aggressive management in such cases. The tumor markers were of limited value for the prediction of recurrences. The suggestion of recurrence when the increase in tumor markers was the only finding was confirmed in only 7%, while confirmation was made in 100% when there was another pathological finding.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The combined value of four tumor markers, in the follow-up of endometrial adenocarcinoma, is analyzed. Cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA 19.9) and carbohydrate antigen 15.3 (CA 15.3) were used in 213 evaluations from 105 patients. Sensitivity as regards recurrence or progression of disease was 45% (CA 125), 9% (SCC), 51% (CA 19.9) and 21% (CA 15.3). Specificities as regards the 'no evidence of disease' ranged from 95% to 99%. Single tumor marker efficiency ranged from 90% for CA 125 to 84% for SCC (p = 0.08). With the two tumor marker combination sensitivity increased up to 77% achieved with CA 125-CA 19.9, but efficiency increased only slightly (92.0% for CA 125-SCC). In the best three tumor marker combination, a sensitivity of 85% was achieved (CA 125-CA 19.9-CA 15.3), and an efficiency of 92.2%. The simultaneous use of the four tumor markers did not improve assay results. The possibility of recurrence or progression of disease in some combinations was very low (4.6% when CA 125 and CA 19.9 negative, 3% when CA 125, CA 19.9 and CA 15.3 negative), a fact to be considered in order to avoid aggressive management in such cases. The tumor markers were of limited value for the prediction of recurrences. The suggestion of recurrence when the increase in tumor markers was the only finding was confirmed in only 7%, while confirmation was made in 100% when there was another pathological finding.

Key concepts: Tumor marker, CA 15-3, Medicine, CA19-9, Antigen, Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoembryonic antigen, Carcinoma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Monitoring endometrial adenocarcinoma with a four tumor marker combination: CA125, squarnous cell carcinoma antigen, CA19.9 and CA15.3 — Research Paper | ScholarLens