1991•Annual Review of Applied LinguisticsRequires access

L2 Literacy and Biliteracy: Linguistic Consequences

Stefan M. Pugh

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Literacy studies can frequently be characterized asprogrammaticand/orevaluative: They focus on the need for literacy programs, on the social consequences of illiteracy, on ways in which the literacy level of a particular population group can be increased, or on the results of various programs already implemented. A glance at a bibliographic resource such as Hladczuk, et al. (1989) reveals that the majority of entries are devoted to “literacy campaigns” and “literacy programs,” “computers and literacy,” “functional literacy,” “history of literacy,” and “libraries and literacy.” Before the 1980s, questions of a linguistic nature were infrequently addressed because emphasis was traditionally placed on thepsychological aspectsof literacy (Bendor-Samuel 1984:5).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Literacy studies can frequently be characterized asprogrammaticand/orevaluative: They focus on the need for literacy programs, on the social consequences of illiteracy, on ways in which the literacy level of a particular population group can be increased, or on the results of various programs already implemented. A glance at a bibliographic resource such as Hladczuk, et al. (1989) reveals that the majority of entries are devoted to “literacy campaigns” and “literacy programs,” “computers and literacy,” “functional literacy,” “history of literacy,” and “libraries and literacy.” Before the 1980s, questions of a linguistic nature were infrequently addressed because emphasis was traditionally placed on thepsychological aspectsof literacy (Bendor-Samuel 1984:5).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Literacy studies can frequently be characterized asprogrammaticand/orevaluative: They focus on the need for literacy programs, on the social consequences of illiteracy, on ways in which the literacy level of a particular population group can be increased, or on the results of various programs already implemented. A glance at a bibliographic resource such as Hladczuk, et al. (1989) reveals that the majority of entries are devoted to “literacy campaigns” and “literacy programs,” “computers and literacy,” “functional literacy,” “history of literacy,” and “libraries and literacy.” Before the 1980s, questions of a linguistic nature were infrequently addressed because emphasis was traditionally placed on thepsychological aspectsof literacy (Bendor-Samuel 1984:5).

Key concepts: Functional illiteracy, Literacy, Information literacy, Critical literacy, Focus (optics), Population, Sociology, Linguistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
L2 Literacy and Biliteracy: Linguistic Consequences — Research Paper | ScholarLens