2013•CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder)Open access

The Role of Language in the Development of Cognitive Flexibility

Lena Lazar

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Executive functioning is a fundamental part of everyday life, but develops slowly across childhood. One essential aspect of executive functioning is cognitive flexibility, the ability to update behavior and thought based on the needs of a constantly changing environment. This study investigated the role of language in the development of cognitive flexibility, which has shown contradictory effects in prior work. For example, labels impaired 3-year-olds’ cognitive flexibility as measured in an instructed cardsorting task (Yerys & Munakata, 2006), but improved 4-year-olds’ cognitive flexibility as measured in an internally-driven card-sorting task (Jacques, Zelazo, Lourenco, & Sutherland, 2007). This study tested whether these opposing findings might be explained by age differences or task differences, by testing 3-year-olds in the Flexible Item Selection Task with and without labels. Children in the condition with explicit labels performed worse than children in the condition with ambiguous labels. These results suggest that explicit labels may impair cognitive flexibility in 3-year-olds, regardless of task, suggesting that age determines whether labels will help or hurt children’s cognitive flexibility. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Executive functioning is a fundamental part of everyday life, but develops slowly across childhood. One essential aspect of executive functioning is cognitive flexibility, the ability to update behavior and thought based on the needs of a constantly changing environment. This study investigated the role of language in the development of cognitive flexibility, which has shown contradictory effects in prior work. For example, labels impaired 3-year-olds’ cognitive flexibility as measured in an instructed cardsorting task (Yerys & Munakata, 2006), but improved 4-year-olds’ cognitive flexibility as measured in an internally-driven card-sorting task (Jacques, Zelazo, Lourenco, & Sutherland, 2007). This study tested whether these opposing findings might be explained by age differences or task differences, by testing 3-year-olds in the Flexible Item Selection Task with and without labels. Children in the condition with explicit labels performed worse than children in the condition with ambiguous labels. These results suggest that explicit labels may impair cognitive flexibility in 3-year-olds, regardless of task, suggesting that age determines whether labels will help or hurt children’s cognitive flexibility. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Executive functioning is a fundamental part of everyday life, but develops slowly across childhood. One essential aspect of executive functioning is cognitive flexibility, the ability to update behavior and thought based on the needs of a constantly changing environment. This study investigated the role of language in the development of cognitive flexibility, which has shown contradictory effects in prior work. For example, labels impaired 3-year-olds’ cognitive flexibility as measured in an instructed cardsorting task (Yerys & Munakata, 2006), but improved 4-year-olds’ cognitive flexibility as measured in an internally-driven card-sorting task (Jacques, Zelazo, Lourenco, & Sutherland, 2007). This study tested whether these opposing findings might be explained by age differences or task differences, by testing 3-year-olds in the Flexible Item Selection Task with and without labels. Children in the condition with explicit labels performed worse than children in the condition with ambiguous labels. These results suggest that explicit labels may impair cognitive flexibility in 3-year-olds, regardless of task, suggesting that age determines whether labels will help or hurt children’s cognitive flexibility. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.

Key concepts: Cognitive flexibility, Flexibility (engineering), Psychology, Cognition, Card sorting, Executive functions, Task switching, Cognitive psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Role of Language in the Development of Cognitive Flexibility — Research Paper | ScholarLens