1939The Journal of Agricultural ScienceRequires access

The quantitative extraction of carotene from grass

F. E. Moon

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

The majority of methods for determining carotene involve a preliminary determination of total carotenoids, followed by a phase separation of the two pigments. This phase separation considerably limits the usefulness of such methods, and in order to dispense with it a direct extraction of carotene is necessary. For this purpose petroleum ether may be used in the presence of alcohol. The use of hot alcoholic potash for the disintegration of leaf material and separation of chlorophyll leads to a very undesirable precipitate which hinders subsequent extraction. Two alternative methods are available, which overcome this difficulty, viz. (1) extraction with hot alcohol, followed by treatment of the extract with potash, and (2) saponification with hot aqueous potash, followed by filtration and extraction of the grass residue with alcohol. The second of these methods has been adopted, being of greater general utility and capable of producing complete cellular breakdown, which is essential for efficient extraction. Details of this extraction process have been described. A comparison of the results obtained, with those from two other methods, has been made by a colorimetric determination of the extracted pigment. The variance and standard error have been shown to be smaller than those for the other two methods, and it has been concluded that the results obtained are reproducible with considerable accuracy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The majority of methods for determining carotene involve a preliminary determination of total carotenoids, followed by a phase separation of the two pigments. This phase separation considerably limits the usefulness of such methods, and in order to dispense with it a direct extraction of carotene is necessary. For this purpose petroleum ether may be used in the presence of alcohol. The use of hot alcoholic potash for the disintegration of leaf material and separation of chlorophyll leads to a very undesirable precipitate which hinders subsequent extraction. Two alternative methods are available, which overcome this difficulty, viz. (1) extraction with hot alcohol, followed by treatment of the extract with potash, and (2) saponification with hot aqueous potash, followed by filtration and extraction of the grass residue with alcohol. The second of these methods has been adopted, being of greater general utility and capable of producing complete cellular breakdown, which is essential for efficient extraction. Details of this extraction process have been described. A comparison of the results obtained, with those from two other methods, has been made by a colorimetric determination of the extracted pigment. The variance and standard error have been shown to be smaller than those for the other two methods, and it has been concluded that the results obtained are reproducible with considerable accuracy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The majority of methods for determining carotene involve a preliminary determination of total carotenoids, followed by a phase separation of the two pigments. This phase separation considerably limits the usefulness of such methods, and in order to dispense with it a direct extraction of carotene is necessary. For this purpose petroleum ether may be used in the presence of alcohol. The use of hot alcoholic potash for the disintegration of leaf material and separation of chlorophyll leads to a very undesirable precipitate which hinders subsequent extraction. Two alternative methods are available, which overcome this difficulty, viz. (1) extraction with hot alcohol, followed by treatment of the extract with potash, and (2) saponification with hot aqueous potash, followed by filtration and extraction of the grass residue with alcohol. The second of these methods has been adopted, being of greater general utility and capable of producing complete cellular breakdown, which is essential for efficient extraction. Details of this extraction process have been described. A comparison of the results obtained, with those from two other methods, has been made by a colorimetric determination of the extracted pigment. The variance and standard error have been shown to be smaller than those for the other two methods, and it has been concluded that the results obtained are reproducible with considerable accuracy.

Key concepts: Saponification, Chromatography, Extraction (chemistry), Potash, Chemistry, Petroleum ether, Pigment, Alcohol

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The quantitative extraction of carotene from grass — Research Paper | ScholarLens