2005BioinformaticsRequires access

The choice of optimal distance measure in genome-wide datasets

Galina Glazko, Alexander Gordon, Arcady Mushegian

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Many types of genomic data are naturally represented as binary vectors. Numerous tasks in computational biology can be cast as analysis of relationships between these vectors, and the first step is, frequently, to compute their pairwise distance matrix. Many distance measures have been proposed in the literature, but there is no theory justifying the choice of distance measure. RESULTS: We examine the approaches to measuring distances between binary vectors and study the characteristic properties of various distance measures and their performance in several tasks of genome analysis. Most distance measures between binary vectors turn out to belong to a single parametric family, namely generalized average-based distance with different exponents. We show that descriptive statistics of distance distribution, such as skewness and kurtosis, can guide the appropriate choice of the exponent. On the contrary, the more familiar distance properties, such as metric and additivity, appear to have much less effect on the performance of distances. AVAILABILITY: R code GADIST and Supplementary material are available at http://research.stowers-institute.org/bioinfo/

About this research paper

What this paper is about

MOTIVATION: Many types of genomic data are naturally represented as binary vectors. Numerous tasks in computational biology can be cast as analysis of relationships between these vectors, and the first step is, frequently, to compute their pairwise distance matrix. Many distance measures have been proposed in the literature, but there is no theory justifying the choice of distance measure. RESULTS: We examine the approaches to measuring distances between binary vectors and study the characteristic properties of various distance measures and their performance in several tasks of genome analysis. Most distance measures between binary vectors turn out to belong to a single parametric family, namely generalized average-based distance with different exponents. We show that descriptive statistics of distance distribution, such as skewness and kurtosis, can guide the appropriate choice of the exponent. On the contrary, the more familiar distance properties, such as metric and additivity, appear to have much less effect on the performance of distances. AVAILABILITY: R code GADIST and Supplementary material are available at http://research.stowers-institute.org/bioinfo/

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

MOTIVATION: Many types of genomic data are naturally represented as binary vectors. Numerous tasks in computational biology can be cast as analysis of relationships between these vectors, and the first step is, frequently, to compute their pairwise distance matrix. Many distance measures have been proposed in the literature, but there is no theory justifying the choice of distance measure. RESULTS: We examine the approaches to measuring distances between binary vectors and study the characteristic properties of various distance measures and their performance in several tasks of genome analysis. Most distance measures between binary vectors turn out to belong to a single parametric family, namely generalized average-based distance with different exponents. We show that descriptive statistics of distance distribution, such as skewness and kurtosis, can guide the appropriate choice of the exponent. On the contrary, the more familiar distance properties, such as metric and additivity, appear to have much less effect on the performance of distances. AVAILABILITY: R code GADIST and Supplementary material are available at http://research.stowers-institute.org/bioinfo/

Key concepts: Distance matrices in phylogeny, Distance measures, Pairwise comparison, Measure (data warehouse), Distance matrix, Metric (unit), Kurtosis, Statistical distance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The choice of optimal distance measure in genome-wide datasets — Research Paper | ScholarLens