2014Revista médica de ChileOpen access

Impacto clínico de un sistema de farmacovigilancia activa realizado por un farmacéutico en el reporte y subnotificación de reacciones adversas a medicamentos

Ignacio Sánchez, Cristián A. Amador, José Cristian Plaza‐Plaza, Gonzalo Correa, Roberto Amador

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of notifying and preventing adverse drug reactions (ADRs), they are under reported and their consequences are not adequately evaluated. AIM: To assess the impact of a pharmacovigilance system carried out by a pharmacist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an internal medicine service, the spontaneous report of ADRs was compared blindly with an active pharmacovigilance system in which a pharmacist detected, monitored and prevented ADRs. RESULTS: A total of 1,196 patients was included. Of these 604 were hospitalized in intervened wards, where 50 suspected ADRs in 47 patients were reported. In non-intervened wards, only three ADRs were spontaneously reported. Therefore, the pharmacovigilance system significantly improved the detection and report of ADRs with a risk ratio of 15.4 (95% confidence intervals 4.8-49.1). Sixty six percent of ADRs were classified as severe. Antimicrobials were the main group of medications causing ADRs in 44% of reports. Forty three percent of ADRs were preventable and prolonged hospital stay by a mean of eight days. CONCLUSIONS: An active pharmacovigilance system carried out by pharmacists improves the detection of ADRs and promotes its prevention.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of notifying and preventing adverse drug reactions (ADRs), they are under reported and their consequences are not adequately evaluated. AIM: To assess the impact of a pharmacovigilance system carried out by a pharmacist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an internal medicine service, the spontaneous report of ADRs was compared blindly with an active pharmacovigilance system in which a pharmacist detected, monitored and prevented ADRs. RESULTS: A total of 1,196 patients was included. Of these 604 were hospitalized in intervened wards, where 50 suspected ADRs in 47 patients were reported. In non-intervened wards, only three ADRs were spontaneously reported. Therefore, the pharmacovigilance system significantly improved the detection and report of ADRs with a risk ratio of 15.4 (95% confidence intervals 4.8-49.1). Sixty six percent of ADRs were classified as severe. Antimicrobials were the main group of medications causing ADRs in 44% of reports. Forty three percent of ADRs were preventable and prolonged hospital stay by a mean of eight days. CONCLUSIONS: An active pharmacovigilance system carried out by pharmacists improves the detection of ADRs and promotes its prevention.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of notifying and preventing adverse drug reactions (ADRs), they are under reported and their consequences are not adequately evaluated. AIM: To assess the impact of a pharmacovigilance system carried out by a pharmacist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an internal medicine service, the spontaneous report of ADRs was compared blindly with an active pharmacovigilance system in which a pharmacist detected, monitored and prevented ADRs. RESULTS: A total of 1,196 patients was included. Of these 604 were hospitalized in intervened wards, where 50 suspected ADRs in 47 patients were reported. In non-intervened wards, only three ADRs were spontaneously reported. Therefore, the pharmacovigilance system significantly improved the detection and report of ADRs with a risk ratio of 15.4 (95% confidence intervals 4.8-49.1). Sixty six percent of ADRs were classified as severe. Antimicrobials were the main group of medications causing ADRs in 44% of reports. Forty three percent of ADRs were preventable and prolonged hospital stay by a mean of eight days. CONCLUSIONS: An active pharmacovigilance system carried out by pharmacists improves the detection of ADRs and promotes its prevention.

Key concepts: Pharmacovigilance, Medicine, Drug reaction, Adverse drug reaction, Pharmacist, Pediatrics, Emergency medicine, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impacto clínico de un sistema de farmacovigilancia activa realizado por un farmacéutico en el reporte y subnotificación de reacciones adversas a medicamentos — Research Paper | ScholarLens