2008Unpublished venueRequires access

Can Styles Improve Architectural Pattern Reuse ?

Sorana Cîmpan, Vincent Couturier

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Software patterns are generic solutions to recurring problems. They are represented as a triplet (problem, context, solution). Several kinds of software patterns were identified, examples of which are analysis, architecture, design or implementation patterns. The current practice is to represent patterns as documents that communicate best practices. Their reuse is limited by several factors among which the lack of formalization. In the context of architecture centered software development, architectural styles are means to represent families of software systems. Several architecture description languages offer support for representing architectural styles. We believe that the use of architectural styles in the representation of architectural pattern solutions can improve the pattern reuse level. The paper details how this improvement can be achieved.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Software patterns are generic solutions to recurring problems. They are represented as a triplet (problem, context, solution). Several kinds of software patterns were identified, examples of which are analysis, architecture, design or implementation patterns. The current practice is to represent patterns as documents that communicate best practices. Their reuse is limited by several factors among which the lack of formalization. In the context of architecture centered software development, architectural styles are means to represent families of software systems. Several architecture description languages offer support for representing architectural styles. We believe that the use of architectural styles in the representation of architectural pattern solutions can improve the pattern reuse level. The paper details how this improvement can be achieved.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Software patterns are generic solutions to recurring problems. They are represented as a triplet (problem, context, solution). Several kinds of software patterns were identified, examples of which are analysis, architecture, design or implementation patterns. The current practice is to represent patterns as documents that communicate best practices. Their reuse is limited by several factors among which the lack of formalization. In the context of architecture centered software development, architectural styles are means to represent families of software systems. Several architecture description languages offer support for representing architectural styles. We believe that the use of architectural styles in the representation of architectural pattern solutions can improve the pattern reuse level. The paper details how this improvement can be achieved.

Key concepts: Architectural pattern, Computer science, Reuse, Software engineering, Software architecture, Software design pattern, Architecture, Architectural style

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Can Styles Improve Architectural Pattern Reuse ? — Research Paper | ScholarLens