The Frontal Lobe Score: part I: construction of a mental status of frontal systems
Thierry Ettlin, Udo Kischka, Michael Beckson, Manuela Gaggiotti, Udo Rauchfleisch, D. Frank Benson
Abstract
Thierry Ettlin, Udo Kischka, Michael Beckson, Manuela Gaggiotti, Udo Rauchfleisch, D. Frank Benson
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a bedside mental status examination to assess the behavioural effects of damage to the frontal lobes. DESIGN: A prospective clinical comparison of patients with cerebral lesions of different locations. SUBJECTS: A total of 118 subjects were examined: 27 patients with cerebral lesions confined to the frontal lobes, 25 patients with cerebral lesions without involvement of the frontal lobes, 18 patients with mixed frontal/nonfrontal lesions, and 48 normal control subjects. MEASURES: Twenty-three mental status tests, clinical examinations and rating scales that had been reported as indicative of frontal lobe function were brought together. By statistical analysis, 12 tests and a neurobehavioural rating scale were selected. These constitute the Frontal Lobe Score (FLS). RESULTS: The FLS detected pure frontal lesions with a sensitivity of 77.7%. It discriminated patients with frontal lesions from normal control subjects with a specificity of 100%. Differentiation from patients with nonfrontal lesions was obtained with a specificity of 84%. CONCLUSION: The Frontal Lobe Score is a useful screening instrument for the clinical detection of effects of frontal lobe damage.
OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a bedside mental status examination to assess the behavioural effects of damage to the frontal lobes. DESIGN: A prospective clinical comparison of patients with cerebral lesions of different locations. SUBJECTS: A total of 118 subjects were examined: 27 patients with cerebral lesions confined to the frontal lobes, 25 patients with cerebral lesions without involvement of the frontal lobes, 18 patients with mixed frontal/nonfrontal lesions, and 48 normal control subjects. MEASURES: Twenty-three mental status tests, clinical examinations and rating scales that had been reported as indicative of frontal lobe function were brought together. By statistical analysis, 12 tests and a neurobehavioural rating scale were selected. These constitute the Frontal Lobe Score (FLS). RESULTS: The FLS detected pure frontal lesions with a sensitivity of 77.7%. It discriminated patients with frontal lesions from normal control subjects with a specificity of 100%. Differentiation from patients with nonfrontal lesions was obtained with a specificity of 84%. CONCLUSION: The Frontal Lobe Score is a useful screening instrument for the clinical detection of effects of frontal lobe damage.
Key concepts: Frontal lobe, Rating scale, Temporal lobe, Medicine, Lesion, Psychology, Audiology, Surgery