Consistency rates of clinical and histopathologic diagnoses of oral soft tissue exophytic lesions.
Javad Sarabadani, Maryam Ghanbariha, Saeedeh Khajehahmadi, Masoumeh Nehighalehno
Abstract
Javad Sarabadani, Maryam Ghanbariha, Saeedeh Khajehahmadi, Masoumeh Nehighalehno
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Histpathologic diagnosis of exophytic lesions is occasionally influenced by clinical and radiograph-ic diagnosis and even the surgeon's observation during biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cases with failure in clinical diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 73 patients with peripheral exophytic lesions were evaluated in Zahedan Faculty of Den-tistry in 2006. Specialists gave their differential diagnoses based on the criteria of oral medicine texts. Then a biopsy was taken and the histopathologic diagnosis was determined. Finally, consistency rates of clinical and histopathologic diagnoses were de-termined. Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS software using Chi-Square and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: In the present study 73 subjects with oral soft tissue (peripheral) exophytic lesions were orally examined and biopsies were taken. Forty-four subjects (60.35%) were females and 29 (39.7%) were males. A total of 81.7% (62 subjects) of clinical diagnoses were consistent with histopathologic reports. In 18.3% (11 subjects) of the cases clinical diagnoses were not con-firmed by histopathologic reports. CONCLUSION: In order to reach a diagnostic agreement, conformity of clinical and histopathologic diagnoses is necessary.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Histpathologic diagnosis of exophytic lesions is occasionally influenced by clinical and radiograph-ic diagnosis and even the surgeon's observation during biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cases with failure in clinical diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 73 patients with peripheral exophytic lesions were evaluated in Zahedan Faculty of Den-tistry in 2006. Specialists gave their differential diagnoses based on the criteria of oral medicine texts. Then a biopsy was taken and the histopathologic diagnosis was determined. Finally, consistency rates of clinical and histopathologic diagnoses were de-termined. Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS software using Chi-Square and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: In the present study 73 subjects with oral soft tissue (peripheral) exophytic lesions were orally examined and biopsies were taken. Forty-four subjects (60.35%) were females and 29 (39.7%) were males. A total of 81.7% (62 subjects) of clinical diagnoses were consistent with histopathologic reports. In 18.3% (11 subjects) of the cases clinical diagnoses were not con-firmed by histopathologic reports. CONCLUSION: In order to reach a diagnostic agreement, conformity of clinical and histopathologic diagnoses is necessary.
Key concepts: Medical diagnosis, Medicine, Biopsy, Histopathology, Soft tissue, Radiology, Pathology