The Exponential Repair Assumption: Practical Impacts
Charles W. Carter, A.W. Malerich
Abstract
Charles W. Carter, A.W. Malerich
Abstract
For repairable systems, we assessed the impact of assuming that the repair follows an exponential distribution versus a lognormal distribution for systems with various ratios of MTBF to MRT and various levels of redundancy. Real repair times, as a rule, generally curve fit to the lognormal distribution. We analyzed the system reliability parameters of R(t), Ao, and MTBDE. We found that reliability was sensitive to low values of the ratio MTBF to MRT, and to moderate and low redundancies. In all cases that displayed a statistically significant difference, the exponential repair assumption inflated system reliability
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For repairable systems, we assessed the impact of assuming that the repair follows an exponential distribution versus a lognormal distribution for systems with various ratios of MTBF to MRT and various levels of redundancy. Real repair times, as a rule, generally curve fit to the lognormal distribution. We analyzed the system reliability parameters of R(t), Ao, and MTBDE. We found that reliability was sensitive to low values of the ratio MTBF to MRT, and to moderate and low redundancies. In all cases that displayed a statistically significant difference, the exponential repair assumption inflated system reliability
Key concepts: Mean time between failures, Log-normal distribution, Exponential distribution, Exponential function, Redundancy (engineering), Reliability engineering, Reliability (semiconductor), Reliability theory