Tight bounds for distributed functional monitoring
David P. Woodruff, Qin Zhang
Abstract
David P. Woodruff, Qin Zhang
Abstract
We resolve several fundamental questions in the area of distributed functional monitoring, initiated by Cormode, Muthukrishnan, and Yi (SODA, 2008), and receiving recent attention. In this model there are k sites each tracking their input streams and communicating with a central coordinator. The coordinator's task is to continuously maintain an approximate output to a function computed over the union of the k streams. The goal is to minimize the number of bits communicated. Let the p-th frequency moment be defined as Fp = ∑i fip, where fi is the frequency of element i. We show the randomized communication complexity of estimating the number of distinct elements (that is, F0) up to a 1+ε factor is Ω(k/ε2), improving upon the previous Ω(k + 1/ε2) bound and matching known upper bounds. For Fp, p > 1, we improve the previous Ω(k + 1/ε2) communication bound to Ω(kp-1/ε2). We obtain similar improvements for heavy hitters, empirical entropy, and other problems. Our lower bounds are the first of any kind in distributed functional monitoring to depend on the product of k and 1/ε2. Moreover, the lower bounds are for the static version of the distributed functional monitoring model where the coordinator only needs to compute the function at the time when all k input streams end; surprisingly they almost match what is achievable in the (dynamic version of) distributed functional monitoring model where the coordinator needs to keep track of the function continuously at any time step. We also show that we can estimate Fp, for any p > 1, using O(kp-1 poly(ε-1)) communication. This drastically improves upon the previous O(k2p+1N1-2/p poly(ε-1)) bound of Cormode, Muthukrishnan, and Yi for general p, and their O(k2/ε + k1.5/ε3) bound for p = 2. For p = 2, our bound resolves their main open question.
OpenAlex reports 93 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We resolve several fundamental questions in the area of distributed functional monitoring, initiated by Cormode, Muthukrishnan, and Yi (SODA, 2008), and receiving recent attention. In this model there are k sites each tracking their input streams and communicating with a central coordinator. The coordinator's task is to continuously maintain an approximate output to a function computed over the union of the k streams. The goal is to minimize the number of bits communicated. Let the p-th frequency moment be defined as Fp = ∑i fip, where fi is the frequency of element i. We show the randomized communication complexity of estimating the number of distinct elements (that is, F0) up to a 1+ε factor is Ω(k/ε2), improving upon the previous Ω(k + 1/ε2) bound and matching known upper bounds. For Fp, p > 1, we improve the previous Ω(k + 1/ε2) communication bound to Ω(kp-1/ε2). We obtain similar improvements for heavy hitters, empirical entropy, and other problems. Our lower bounds are the first of any kind in distributed functional monitoring to depend on the product of k and 1/ε2. Moreover, the lower bounds are for the static version of the distributed functional monitoring model where the coordinator only needs to compute the function at the time when all k input streams end; surprisingly they almost match what is achievable in the (dynamic version of) distributed functional monitoring model where the coordinator needs to keep track of the function continuously at any time step. We also show that we can estimate Fp, for any p > 1, using O(kp-1 poly(ε-1)) communication. This drastically improves upon the previous O(k2p+1N1-2/p poly(ε-1)) bound of Cormode, Muthukrishnan, and Yi for general p, and their O(k2/ε + k1.5/ε3) bound for p = 2. For p = 2, our bound resolves their main open question.
Key concepts: Computer science, Upper and lower bounds, Function (biology), Matching (statistics), Task (project management), Product (mathematics), Entropy (arrow of time), Algorithm