2010TSpace (University of Toronto)Open access

Evaluation of cytotoxicity of accessories used for traction of impacted teeth

Rogério Lacerda dos Santos, Matheus Melo Pithon, Fernanda Otaviano Martins, Maria Teresa Villela Romanos, Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Aim: To test the hypothesis that gold-coated orthodontic accessories used for canine traction are less cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel. Methods: Six different orthodontic accessories were evaluated, three of them made from stainless steel (1 - bracket, 2 - button, 3 - mesh pad) and three made from a gold-coated alloy (4 - small mesh pad, 5 button, 6 - big mesh pad). Three control groups were also analyzed: Positive control (C+), consisting of Tween 80 cell detergent; Negative control (C-), consisting of PBS; and Cell control (CC), consisting of cells not exposed to any material. Dye-uptake technique, in which neutral red dye is incorporated into viable cells, was used to assess the cytotoxicity of the accessories. Viable cell counting was performed using a spectrophotometer. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey′s test. Results: Statistically significant differences (P< 0.05) were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups 4-6. However, no differences were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups C- and CC, and neither between Groups 4-6 and Group C+. Conclusions: The tested hypothesis was not confirmed since gold-coated orthodontic accessories were found to be more cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aim: To test the hypothesis that gold-coated orthodontic accessories used for canine traction are less cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel. Methods: Six different orthodontic accessories were evaluated, three of them made from stainless steel (1 - bracket, 2 - button, 3 - mesh pad) and three made from a gold-coated alloy (4 - small mesh pad, 5 button, 6 - big mesh pad). Three control groups were also analyzed: Positive control (C+), consisting of Tween 80 cell detergent; Negative control (C-), consisting of PBS; and Cell control (CC), consisting of cells not exposed to any material. Dye-uptake technique, in which neutral red dye is incorporated into viable cells, was used to assess the cytotoxicity of the accessories. Viable cell counting was performed using a spectrophotometer. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey′s test. Results: Statistically significant differences (P< 0.05) were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups 4-6. However, no differences were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups C- and CC, and neither between Groups 4-6 and Group C+. Conclusions: The tested hypothesis was not confirmed since gold-coated orthodontic accessories were found to be more cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aim: To test the hypothesis that gold-coated orthodontic accessories used for canine traction are less cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel. Methods: Six different orthodontic accessories were evaluated, three of them made from stainless steel (1 - bracket, 2 - button, 3 - mesh pad) and three made from a gold-coated alloy (4 - small mesh pad, 5 button, 6 - big mesh pad). Three control groups were also analyzed: Positive control (C+), consisting of Tween 80 cell detergent; Negative control (C-), consisting of PBS; and Cell control (CC), consisting of cells not exposed to any material. Dye-uptake technique, in which neutral red dye is incorporated into viable cells, was used to assess the cytotoxicity of the accessories. Viable cell counting was performed using a spectrophotometer. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey′s test. Results: Statistically significant differences (P< 0.05) were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups 4-6. However, no differences were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups C- and CC, and neither between Groups 4-6 and Group C+. Conclusions: The tested hypothesis was not confirmed since gold-coated orthodontic accessories were found to be more cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel.

Key concepts: Positive control, Negative control, Cytotoxicity, Dentistry, Traction (geology), Bracket, Materials science, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of cytotoxicity of accessories used for traction of impacted teeth — Research Paper | ScholarLens