Evaluation of cytotoxicity of accessories used for traction of impacted teeth
Rogério Lacerda dos Santos, Matheus Melo Pithon, Fernanda Otaviano Martins, Maria Teresa Villela Romanos, Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas
Abstract
Open-access reader
Rogério Lacerda dos Santos, Matheus Melo Pithon, Fernanda Otaviano Martins, Maria Teresa Villela Romanos, Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas
Abstract
Open-access reader
Aim: To test the hypothesis that gold-coated orthodontic accessories used for canine traction are less cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel. Methods: Six different orthodontic accessories were evaluated, three of them made from stainless steel (1 - bracket, 2 - button, 3 - mesh pad) and three made from a gold-coated alloy (4 - small mesh pad, 5 button, 6 - big mesh pad). Three control groups were also analyzed: Positive control (C+), consisting of Tween 80 cell detergent; Negative control (C-), consisting of PBS; and Cell control (CC), consisting of cells not exposed to any material. Dye-uptake technique, in which neutral red dye is incorporated into viable cells, was used to assess the cytotoxicity of the accessories. Viable cell counting was performed using a spectrophotometer. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey′s test. Results: Statistically significant differences (P< 0.05) were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups 4-6. However, no differences were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups C- and CC, and neither between Groups 4-6 and Group C+. Conclusions: The tested hypothesis was not confirmed since gold-coated orthodontic accessories were found to be more cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Aim: To test the hypothesis that gold-coated orthodontic accessories used for canine traction are less cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel. Methods: Six different orthodontic accessories were evaluated, three of them made from stainless steel (1 - bracket, 2 - button, 3 - mesh pad) and three made from a gold-coated alloy (4 - small mesh pad, 5 button, 6 - big mesh pad). Three control groups were also analyzed: Positive control (C+), consisting of Tween 80 cell detergent; Negative control (C-), consisting of PBS; and Cell control (CC), consisting of cells not exposed to any material. Dye-uptake technique, in which neutral red dye is incorporated into viable cells, was used to assess the cytotoxicity of the accessories. Viable cell counting was performed using a spectrophotometer. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey′s test. Results: Statistically significant differences (P< 0.05) were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups 4-6. However, no differences were found between Groups 1-3 and Groups C- and CC, and neither between Groups 4-6 and Group C+. Conclusions: The tested hypothesis was not confirmed since gold-coated orthodontic accessories were found to be more cytotoxic than those made of stainless steel.
Key concepts: Positive control, Negative control, Cytotoxicity, Dentistry, Traction (geology), Bracket, Materials science, Chemistry