2009Archives of SurgeryRequires access

Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Jason H. Ko

Open publisher page 175 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and describe the evolution of the "components separation" technique for abdominal wall repair in 200 consecutive patients. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois. PATIENTS: Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent ventral hernia repair using the components separation technique. INTERVENTIONS: Biological and permanent meshes were used in select patients to augment the repair of the midline fascial closure but were not used as "bridging" materials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hernia recurrence rates and major and minor complication rates for the overall series and for the different techniques. RESULTS: Primary components separation (n = 158) yielded a 22.8% recurrence rate. Closure of the midline tissues with augmentation of the repair using an acellular cadaveric dermis underlay (n = 18) had a 33.3% recurrence rate requiring a second operation, whereas intra-abdominal soft polypropylene mesh (n = 18) had 0% recurrence (P = .04). Elevated body mass index was a significant risk factor predicting hernia recurrence (P = .003). Contamination (P = .04) and enterocutaneous fistula (P = .02) at the time of surgery were associated with increased major complications, whereas body mass index (P = .01) and diabetes mellitus (P = .04) were associated with increased minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: Large complex hernias can be reliably repaired using the components separation technique despite the presence of open wounds, the need for bowel surgery, and numerous comorbidities. The long-term strength of the hernia repair is not augmented by acellular cadaveric dermis but seems to be improved with soft polypropylene mesh.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and describe the evolution of the "components separation" technique for abdominal wall repair in 200 consecutive patients. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois. PATIENTS: Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent ventral hernia repair using the components separation technique. INTERVENTIONS: Biological and permanent meshes were used in select patients to augment the repair of the midline fascial closure but were not used as "bridging" materials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hernia recurrence rates and major and minor complication rates for the overall series and for the different techniques. RESULTS: Primary components separation (n = 158) yielded a 22.8% recurrence rate. Closure of the midline tissues with augmentation of the repair using an acellular cadaveric dermis underlay (n = 18) had a 33.3% recurrence rate requiring a second operation, whereas intra-abdominal soft polypropylene mesh (n = 18) had 0% recurrence (P = .04). Elevated body mass index was a significant risk factor predicting hernia recurrence (P = .003). Contamination (P = .04) and enterocutaneous fistula (P = .02) at the time of surgery were associated with increased major complications, whereas body mass index (P = .01) and diabetes mellitus (P = .04) were associated with increased minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: Large complex hernias can be reliably repaired using the components separation technique despite the presence of open wounds, the need for bowel surgery, and numerous comorbidities. The long-term strength of the hernia repair is not augmented by acellular cadaveric dermis but seems to be improved with soft polypropylene mesh.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 175 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and describe the evolution of the "components separation" technique for abdominal wall repair in 200 consecutive patients. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois. PATIENTS: Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent ventral hernia repair using the components separation technique. INTERVENTIONS: Biological and permanent meshes were used in select patients to augment the repair of the midline fascial closure but were not used as "bridging" materials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hernia recurrence rates and major and minor complication rates for the overall series and for the different techniques. RESULTS: Primary components separation (n = 158) yielded a 22.8% recurrence rate. Closure of the midline tissues with augmentation of the repair using an acellular cadaveric dermis underlay (n = 18) had a 33.3% recurrence rate requiring a second operation, whereas intra-abdominal soft polypropylene mesh (n = 18) had 0% recurrence (P = .04). Elevated body mass index was a significant risk factor predicting hernia recurrence (P = .003). Contamination (P = .04) and enterocutaneous fistula (P = .02) at the time of surgery were associated with increased major complications, whereas body mass index (P = .01) and diabetes mellitus (P = .04) were associated with increased minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: Large complex hernias can be reliably repaired using the components separation technique despite the presence of open wounds, the need for bowel surgery, and numerous comorbidities. The long-term strength of the hernia repair is not augmented by acellular cadaveric dermis but seems to be improved with soft polypropylene mesh.

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Hernia, Abdominal wall, Hernia repair, Cadaveric spasm, Abdominal surgery, Acellular Dermis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction — Research Paper | ScholarLens