Toward Contextualized Apologetics
Harold A. Netland
Abstract
Harold A. Netland
Abstract
Apologetics is frequently rejected as irrelevant or even counterproductive in non-Western contexts. While it is true that apologetics, as it has been conducted in the past, is generally identified with Western theology, the author suggests that, properly construed, apologetics is unavoidable and that developing an informed and culturally sensitive apologetic is an indispensable task for the non-Western church. A crucial distinction is made between transcultural apologetics and culture-specific (contextualized) apologetics. The article concludes by suggesting in general terms the shape a contextualized apologetic for contemporary Japan might take.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Apologetics is frequently rejected as irrelevant or even counterproductive in non-Western contexts. While it is true that apologetics, as it has been conducted in the past, is generally identified with Western theology, the author suggests that, properly construed, apologetics is unavoidable and that developing an informed and culturally sensitive apologetic is an indispensable task for the non-Western church. A crucial distinction is made between transcultural apologetics and culture-specific (contextualized) apologetics. The article concludes by suggesting in general terms the shape a contextualized apologetic for contemporary Japan might take.
Key concepts: Apologetics, Task (project management), Epistemology, Sociology, Philosophy, Religious studies, Economics, Management