Valaciclovir versus aciclovir for herpes simplex virus infection in HIV-infected individuals: two randomized trials
Marcus A. Conant, Timothy W. Schacker, Robert L. Murphy, Jonathan Gold, Lila Crutchfield, R. J. Crooks
Abstract
Marcus A. Conant, Timothy W. Schacker, Robert L. Murphy, Jonathan Gold, Lila Crutchfield, R. J. Crooks
Abstract
Our objective was to evaluate valaciclovir for anogenital herpes in HIV-infected individuals using 2 controlled trials conducted before highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was used. In Study 1, 1062 patients (CD4+ > or = 100 cells/mm(3)) received suppressive valaciclovir or aciclovir for one year and were assessed monthly. In Study 2, 467 patients were treated episodically for > or =5 days with valaciclovir or aciclovir and evaluated daily. Valaciclovir was as effective as aciclovir for suppression and episodic treatment of herpes. Hazard ratios [95% confidence interval (CI)] for time to recurrence for valaciclovir 500 mg twice daily and 1000 mg once daily vs aciclovir were 0.73[0.50, 1.06], P=0.10, and 1.31[0.94, 1.82], P=0.11. Valaciclovir 500 mg twice daily was superior to 1000 mg once daily, P=0.001. Valaciclovir 1000 mg twice daily was comparable to aciclovir on herpes episode duration (hazard ratio 0.92[0.75, 1.14]). Adverse events were similar among treatments. In conclusion, valaciclovir is a safe, effective, convenient alternative to aciclovir for HSV infection in HIV-infected individuals.
OpenAlex reports 117 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Our objective was to evaluate valaciclovir for anogenital herpes in HIV-infected individuals using 2 controlled trials conducted before highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was used. In Study 1, 1062 patients (CD4+ > or = 100 cells/mm(3)) received suppressive valaciclovir or aciclovir for one year and were assessed monthly. In Study 2, 467 patients were treated episodically for > or =5 days with valaciclovir or aciclovir and evaluated daily. Valaciclovir was as effective as aciclovir for suppression and episodic treatment of herpes. Hazard ratios [95% confidence interval (CI)] for time to recurrence for valaciclovir 500 mg twice daily and 1000 mg once daily vs aciclovir were 0.73[0.50, 1.06], P=0.10, and 1.31[0.94, 1.82], P=0.11. Valaciclovir 500 mg twice daily was superior to 1000 mg once daily, P=0.001. Valaciclovir 1000 mg twice daily was comparable to aciclovir on herpes episode duration (hazard ratio 0.92[0.75, 1.14]). Adverse events were similar among treatments. In conclusion, valaciclovir is a safe, effective, convenient alternative to aciclovir for HSV infection in HIV-infected individuals.
Key concepts: Valaciclovir, Aciclovir, Medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Hazard ratio, Herpes simplex virus, Penciclovir, Adverse effect