2013Romanian Agricultural ResearchRequires access

Effects of different tillage and fallow methods on wheat yield and soil quality.

Mehmet Zengin, Fatma Ocakoğlu

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine the effects of different tillage strip and fallow methods on wheat yield, and yield components, and loam soil quality in semiarid Central Anatolia region in 2010 and 2011. Three plowing and fallow methods, the minimum tillage/stubble fallow, plowing/stubble fallow and plowing/nonstubble fallow methods were implemented, and bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum cv. Ekiz) was planted. The plowing/stubble fallow method was more effective than the other methods in terms of high grain yield and yield components. This method led to a yield increase of ~50% in both years when compared to the minimum tillage/stubble fallow method. Although both wheat yield and soil quality were positively affected by stubble fallow method, the several farming problems, such as, ignorance of strip farming, difficulty of cultivating in a strip, and leaving a strip blank, and decreased annual net income due to the fallowed strips, may prevent the use of this conservation practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The study was conducted to determine the effects of different tillage strip and fallow methods on wheat yield, and yield components, and loam soil quality in semiarid Central Anatolia region in 2010 and 2011. Three plowing and fallow methods, the minimum tillage/stubble fallow, plowing/stubble fallow and plowing/nonstubble fallow methods were implemented, and bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum cv. Ekiz) was planted. The plowing/stubble fallow method was more effective than the other methods in terms of high grain yield and yield components. This method led to a yield increase of ~50% in both years when compared to the minimum tillage/stubble fallow method. Although both wheat yield and soil quality were positively affected by stubble fallow method, the several farming problems, such as, ignorance of strip farming, difficulty of cultivating in a strip, and leaving a strip blank, and decreased annual net income due to the fallowed strips, may prevent the use of this conservation practice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The study was conducted to determine the effects of different tillage strip and fallow methods on wheat yield, and yield components, and loam soil quality in semiarid Central Anatolia region in 2010 and 2011. Three plowing and fallow methods, the minimum tillage/stubble fallow, plowing/stubble fallow and plowing/nonstubble fallow methods were implemented, and bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum cv. Ekiz) was planted. The plowing/stubble fallow method was more effective than the other methods in terms of high grain yield and yield components. This method led to a yield increase of ~50% in both years when compared to the minimum tillage/stubble fallow method. Although both wheat yield and soil quality were positively affected by stubble fallow method, the several farming problems, such as, ignorance of strip farming, difficulty of cultivating in a strip, and leaving a strip blank, and decreased annual net income due to the fallowed strips, may prevent the use of this conservation practice.

Key concepts: Plough, Tillage, Agronomy, Strip-till, Loam, Yield (engineering), Minimum tillage, Soil quality

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of different tillage and fallow methods on wheat yield and soil quality. — Research Paper | ScholarLens