2004Journal of ChemometricsRequires access

Mean squared error of prediction (MSEP) estimates for principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR)

Bjørn‐Helge Mevik, Henrik René Cederkvist

Open publisher page 248 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents results from simulations based on real data, comparing several competing mean squared error of prediction (MSEP) estimators on principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR): leave‐one‐out cross‐validation, K ‐fold and adjusted K ‐fold cross‐validation, the ordinary bootstrap estimate, the bootstrap smoothed cross‐validation (BCV) estimate and the 0.632 bootstrap estimate. The overall performance of the estimators is compared in terms of their bias, variance and squared error. The results indicate that the 0.632 estimate and leave‐one‐out cross‐validation are preferable when one can afford the computation. Otherwise adjusted 5‐ or 10‐fold cross‐validation are good candidates because of their computational efficiency. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This paper presents results from simulations based on real data, comparing several competing mean squared error of prediction (MSEP) estimators on principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR): leave‐one‐out cross‐validation, K ‐fold and adjusted K ‐fold cross‐validation, the ordinary bootstrap estimate, the bootstrap smoothed cross‐validation (BCV) estimate and the 0.632 bootstrap estimate. The overall performance of the estimators is compared in terms of their bias, variance and squared error. The results indicate that the 0.632 estimate and leave‐one‐out cross‐validation are preferable when one can afford the computation. Otherwise adjusted 5‐ or 10‐fold cross‐validation are good candidates because of their computational efficiency. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 248 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This paper presents results from simulations based on real data, comparing several competing mean squared error of prediction (MSEP) estimators on principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR): leave‐one‐out cross‐validation, K ‐fold and adjusted K ‐fold cross‐validation, the ordinary bootstrap estimate, the bootstrap smoothed cross‐validation (BCV) estimate and the 0.632 bootstrap estimate. The overall performance of the estimators is compared in terms of their bias, variance and squared error. The results indicate that the 0.632 estimate and leave‐one‐out cross‐validation are preferable when one can afford the computation. Otherwise adjusted 5‐ or 10‐fold cross‐validation are good candidates because of their computational efficiency. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Key concepts: Partial least squares regression, Principal component regression, Statistics, Cross-validation, Estimator, Mean squared error, Ordinary least squares, Principal component analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mean squared error of prediction (MSEP) estimates for principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR) — Research Paper | ScholarLens