2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparative analysis of sludge settleability of A2O-BAF process and A2O process treating higher C/N ratio domestic sewage

Xin Li, Yongzhen Peng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A2O process is an effective nitrogen and phosphorus removal process. A2O-Biological Aerated Filter (BAF) process is a new nitrogen and phosphorus removal process basing on the two-sludge theory. Separation of activated sludge is one of the difficult problems encountered in the activated sludge process. Sludge bulking is the most difficult problem. The experiment put great emphasis on the sludge settleability of the two processes, when they are used to treat the higher C/N ratio domestic sewage. The two systems were operated for 30 days at the C/N ratio of about 7.1. The experiment result showed: the sludge settleability of A2O-BAF process is far better than A2O process, the former is without the risk of sludge bulking, while the latter is more serious. The main reasons are: A2O-BAF process has long anoxic zone and short aerobic zone, so it can inhibit sludge bulking effectively; phosphorus content in sludge of A2O-BAF process is twice more than that of A2O process, the former's is about 6%, the latter's is about 3%; the sludge floating problem faced by A2O-BAF process is far less serious than A2O process, the floc is denser and more cohesive.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A2O process is an effective nitrogen and phosphorus removal process. A2O-Biological Aerated Filter (BAF) process is a new nitrogen and phosphorus removal process basing on the two-sludge theory. Separation of activated sludge is one of the difficult problems encountered in the activated sludge process. Sludge bulking is the most difficult problem. The experiment put great emphasis on the sludge settleability of the two processes, when they are used to treat the higher C/N ratio domestic sewage. The two systems were operated for 30 days at the C/N ratio of about 7.1. The experiment result showed: the sludge settleability of A2O-BAF process is far better than A2O process, the former is without the risk of sludge bulking, while the latter is more serious. The main reasons are: A2O-BAF process has long anoxic zone and short aerobic zone, so it can inhibit sludge bulking effectively; phosphorus content in sludge of A2O-BAF process is twice more than that of A2O process, the former's is about 6%, the latter's is about 3%; the sludge floating problem faced by A2O-BAF process is far less serious than A2O process, the floc is denser and more cohesive.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A2O process is an effective nitrogen and phosphorus removal process. A2O-Biological Aerated Filter (BAF) process is a new nitrogen and phosphorus removal process basing on the two-sludge theory. Separation of activated sludge is one of the difficult problems encountered in the activated sludge process. Sludge bulking is the most difficult problem. The experiment put great emphasis on the sludge settleability of the two processes, when they are used to treat the higher C/N ratio domestic sewage. The two systems were operated for 30 days at the C/N ratio of about 7.1. The experiment result showed: the sludge settleability of A2O-BAF process is far better than A2O process, the former is without the risk of sludge bulking, while the latter is more serious. The main reasons are: A2O-BAF process has long anoxic zone and short aerobic zone, so it can inhibit sludge bulking effectively; phosphorus content in sludge of A2O-BAF process is twice more than that of A2O process, the former's is about 6%, the latter's is about 3%; the sludge floating problem faced by A2O-BAF process is far less serious than A2O process, the floc is denser and more cohesive.

Key concepts: Sewage sludge, Phosphorus, Activated sludge, Chemistry, Nuclear chemistry, Waste management, Sewage treatment, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative analysis of sludge settleability of A2O-BAF process and A2O process treating higher C/N ratio domestic sewage — Research Paper | ScholarLens