2002Unpublished venueRequires access

SMART retransmission: performance with overload and random losses

Srinivasan Keshav, S. Philip Morgan

Open publisher page 49 citations

Abstract

Feedback flow control, in conjunction with limited buffering in the network, inevitably leads to packet loss. Effective congestion control requires not only effective flow control but also a good retransmission strategy. We present a new retransmission strategy called SMART that combines the best features of the traditional go-back-n and selective-retransmit strategies. We show, first, that go-back-n retransmission with static window flow control leads to congestion collapse when the nominal load exceeds the link capacity. Second, we can avert congestion collapse by replacing go-back-n with SMART retransmission, even with static window flow control. Third, SMART retransmission, when combined with packet-pair rate-based flow control, performs extremely well, both when losses are due to buffer overflows and when losses are random.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Feedback flow control, in conjunction with limited buffering in the network, inevitably leads to packet loss. Effective congestion control requires not only effective flow control but also a good retransmission strategy. We present a new retransmission strategy called SMART that combines the best features of the traditional go-back-n and selective-retransmit strategies. We show, first, that go-back-n retransmission with static window flow control leads to congestion collapse when the nominal load exceeds the link capacity. Second, we can avert congestion collapse by replacing go-back-n with SMART retransmission, even with static window flow control. Third, SMART retransmission, when combined with packet-pair rate-based flow control, performs extremely well, both when losses are due to buffer overflows and when losses are random.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Feedback flow control, in conjunction with limited buffering in the network, inevitably leads to packet loss. Effective congestion control requires not only effective flow control but also a good retransmission strategy. We present a new retransmission strategy called SMART that combines the best features of the traditional go-back-n and selective-retransmit strategies. We show, first, that go-back-n retransmission with static window flow control leads to congestion collapse when the nominal load exceeds the link capacity. Second, we can avert congestion collapse by replacing go-back-n with SMART retransmission, even with static window flow control. Third, SMART retransmission, when combined with packet-pair rate-based flow control, performs extremely well, both when losses are due to buffer overflows and when losses are random.

Key concepts: Retransmission, Flow control (data), Computer science, Computer network, Network packet, Packet loss, Network congestion, Throughput

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SMART retransmission: performance with overload and random losses — Research Paper | ScholarLens