1995Soil Science Society of America JournalRequires access

Precision of Neutron Scattering and Capacitance Type Soil Water Content Gauges from Field Calibration

Steven R. Evett, Jean L. Steiner

Open publisher page 233 citations

Abstract

Abstract Soil water content gauges based on neutron scattering (NS) have been a valuable tool for soil water investigations for some 40 yr. However, licensing, training, and safety regulations pertaining to the radioactive source in these gauges makes their use expensive and prevents use in some situations such as unattended monitoring. A capacitance probe (CP) gauge has characteristics that would seem to make it an ideal replacement for NS gauges. We determined the relative precision of two brands of NS gauges (three gauges of each) and a brand of CP gauge (four gauges) in a field calibration exercise. Both brands of NS gauges were calibrated vs. volumetric soil water content with coefficients of determination ( r 2 ) ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 and root mean squared errors (RMSE) <0.012 m 3 m −3 water content. Calibrations for the CP gauges resulted in r 2 ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 and RMSE of 0.036 m 3 m −3 water content. Average 95% confidence intervals on predictions were three to five times higher for the CP gauges than for the NS gauges, ranging from 0.153 to 0.161 and 0.032 to 0.052 m 3 m −3 , respectively. Although poorly correlated with soil water content, readings were reproducible among the four CP gauges. The poor correlation for CP gauges may be due to small‐scale soil water content variations within the measurement volume of the gauge. The NS gauges provide acceptable precision but the CP gauge has poor precision and is unacceptable for routine soil water content measurements.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Soil water content gauges based on neutron scattering (NS) have been a valuable tool for soil water investigations for some 40 yr. However, licensing, training, and safety regulations pertaining to the radioactive source in these gauges makes their use expensive and prevents use in some situations such as unattended monitoring. A capacitance probe (CP) gauge has characteristics that would seem to make it an ideal replacement for NS gauges. We determined the relative precision of two brands of NS gauges (three gauges of each) and a brand of CP gauge (four gauges) in a field calibration exercise. Both brands of NS gauges were calibrated vs. volumetric soil water content with coefficients of determination ( r 2 ) ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 and root mean squared errors (RMSE) <0.012 m 3 m −3 water content. Calibrations for the CP gauges resulted in r 2 ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 and RMSE of 0.036 m 3 m −3 water content. Average 95% confidence intervals on predictions were three to five times higher for the CP gauges than for the NS gauges, ranging from 0.153 to 0.161 and 0.032 to 0.052 m 3 m −3 , respectively. Although poorly correlated with soil water content, readings were reproducible among the four CP gauges. The poor correlation for CP gauges may be due to small‐scale soil water content variations within the measurement volume of the gauge. The NS gauges provide acceptable precision but the CP gauge has poor precision and is unacceptable for routine soil water content measurements.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 233 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Soil water content gauges based on neutron scattering (NS) have been a valuable tool for soil water investigations for some 40 yr. However, licensing, training, and safety regulations pertaining to the radioactive source in these gauges makes their use expensive and prevents use in some situations such as unattended monitoring. A capacitance probe (CP) gauge has characteristics that would seem to make it an ideal replacement for NS gauges. We determined the relative precision of two brands of NS gauges (three gauges of each) and a brand of CP gauge (four gauges) in a field calibration exercise. Both brands of NS gauges were calibrated vs. volumetric soil water content with coefficients of determination ( r 2 ) ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 and root mean squared errors (RMSE) <0.012 m 3 m −3 water content. Calibrations for the CP gauges resulted in r 2 ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 and RMSE of 0.036 m 3 m −3 water content. Average 95% confidence intervals on predictions were three to five times higher for the CP gauges than for the NS gauges, ranging from 0.153 to 0.161 and 0.032 to 0.052 m 3 m −3 , respectively. Although poorly correlated with soil water content, readings were reproducible among the four CP gauges. The poor correlation for CP gauges may be due to small‐scale soil water content variations within the measurement volume of the gauge. The NS gauges provide acceptable precision but the CP gauge has poor precision and is unacceptable for routine soil water content measurements.

Key concepts: Calibration, Water content, Soil water, Capacitance, Content (measure theory), Environmental science, Soil science, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Precision of Neutron Scattering and Capacitance Type Soil Water Content Gauges from Field Calibration — Research Paper | ScholarLens