Revisiting Oligopolistic Reaction: Are FDI Decisions Strategic Complements?
Keith Head, Thierry Mayer, John Ries
Abstract
Keith Head, Thierry Mayer, John Ries
Abstract
Knickerbocker (1973) introduced "oligopolistic reaction" to explain why firms follow rivals into foreign markets. We develop a model that incorporates central features of Knickerbocker 's story---oligopoly, uncertainty, and risk aversion---to establish the conditions required to generate follow-the-leader behaviour. We find that rival foreign investment will make risk-neutral firms less inclined to move abroad once its rivals have done so. We show that the Knickerbocker prediction relies on risk aversion and derive an expression for the minimum amount of risk aversion needed to generate oligopolistic reaction.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Knickerbocker (1973) introduced "oligopolistic reaction" to explain why firms follow rivals into foreign markets. We develop a model that incorporates central features of Knickerbocker 's story---oligopoly, uncertainty, and risk aversion---to establish the conditions required to generate follow-the-leader behaviour. We find that rival foreign investment will make risk-neutral firms less inclined to move abroad once its rivals have done so. We show that the Knickerbocker prediction relies on risk aversion and derive an expression for the minimum amount of risk aversion needed to generate oligopolistic reaction.
Key concepts: Oligopoly, Strategic complements, Foreign direct investment, Risk aversion (psychology), Economics, Microeconomics, Investment (military), Financial economics