Application of integrated diagnostic process to non-avionics systems
Dennis L. Gärtner, S.E. Dibbert
Abstract
Dennis L. Gärtner, S.E. Dibbert
Abstract
Most efforts to improve the diagnostic performance of military aircraft systems/subsystems and off-aircraft maintenance have focused mainly on avionics systems/subsystems. From that effort a process (Integrated Diagnostics) has evolved to address some of the major contributors to poor diagnostic performance and has been implemented at The Boeing Company with demonstrated success. Even though the tools used were developed based on avionics, the tools should benefit non-avionics systems. This paper documents the results of applying those tools to a fighter aircraft hydraulic system.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Most efforts to improve the diagnostic performance of military aircraft systems/subsystems and off-aircraft maintenance have focused mainly on avionics systems/subsystems. From that effort a process (Integrated Diagnostics) has evolved to address some of the major contributors to poor diagnostic performance and has been implemented at The Boeing Company with demonstrated success. Even though the tools used were developed based on avionics, the tools should benefit non-avionics systems. This paper documents the results of applying those tools to a fighter aircraft hydraulic system.
Key concepts: Avionics, Systems engineering, Process (computing), Engineering, Aircraft maintenance, Integrated modular avionics, Computer science, Reliability engineering