Regulation of the Queensland Legal Profession: The Quinquennium of Change
G Dal Pont
Abstract
G Dal Pont
Abstract
Members of the legal profession are accustomed to change. They need to be.Whether it be the constant stream of statutory change, or the increasing number ofcases decided by the courts (especially with its newfound electronic accessibility),there is little in legal practice that remains static. As a focus of this article is change,it heralds no new experience for the practising lawyer. But here the change relates tomatters at the core of the lawyers practice, because in 2007 Queensland saw theenactment of the Legal Profession Act 2007 (the 2007 Act) and the commencementof the Legal Profession (Solicitors) Rule 2007 (the 2007 Rule). Various aspects ofthese documents were not new; indeed, in some respects the 2007 Act essentiallyreplicated what had been law under a 2004 Act of the same name. Yet it alsoaddressed important topics previously located in other legislation, which it hadproven premature to include in its 2004 counterpart. The 2007 Rule represents amore marked shift, if perhaps more in form that in ultimate substance. Together, in any case, these enactments represent what is arguably the mostsignificant single regulatory impact on the Queensland legal profession, certainly inrecent times. It is therefore apt to give some consideration each of them. In so doing,this article does not go through the Act and the Rule in meticulous detail. Instead, itmakes various general observations regarding the role and effect of both the Act andthe Rule, on occasion illustrated by the specific.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Members of the legal profession are accustomed to change. They need to be.Whether it be the constant stream of statutory change, or the increasing number ofcases decided by the courts (especially with its newfound electronic accessibility),there is little in legal practice that remains static. As a focus of this article is change,it heralds no new experience for the practising lawyer. But here the change relates tomatters at the core of the lawyers practice, because in 2007 Queensland saw theenactment of the Legal Profession Act 2007 (the 2007 Act) and the commencementof the Legal Profession (Solicitors) Rule 2007 (the 2007 Rule). Various aspects ofthese documents were not new; indeed, in some respects the 2007 Act essentiallyreplicated what had been law under a 2004 Act of the same name. Yet it alsoaddressed important topics previously located in other legislation, which it hadproven premature to include in its 2004 counterpart. The 2007 Rule represents amore marked shift, if perhaps more in form that in ultimate substance. Together, in any case, these enactments represent what is arguably the mostsignificant single regulatory impact on the Queensland legal profession, certainly inrecent times. It is therefore apt to give some consideration each of them. In so doing,this article does not go through the Act and the Rule in meticulous detail. Instead, itmakes various general observations regarding the role and effect of both the Act andthe Rule, on occasion illustrated by the specific.
Key concepts: Project commissioning, Legal profession, Law, Publishing, Political science