2002TectonicsRequires access

Revisiting the paleomagnetism of the 1.476 Ga St. Francois Mountains igneous province, Missouri

Joseph G. Meert, W. M. Stuckey

Open publisher page 73 citations

Abstract

A paleomagnetic investigation of the St. Francois Mountains igneous province in southeastern Missouri provides a key 1476 ± 16 Ma paleomagnetic pole for Laurentia. The pole (13.2°S, 219.0°E; dp = 4.7°, dm = 8.0°) is considered primary on the basis of positive conglomerate, inverse baked contact, and fold tests. An analysis of 1470–1430 Ma poles from Laurentia highlights key differences between poles obtained from the Belt Supergroup, Electra Lake gabbro, and cratonic North America. Paleolatitudes based on the Lower Belt Supergroup poles are enigmatic, as two previous studies yielded a difference of 10°. Our new pole, combined with an analysis of previous results, favors the higher latitude interpretation for the Lower Belt Supergroup. Paleolatitudes from the younger Belt rocks indicate lower latitudes than coeval rocks from elsewhere in Laurentia for which there has been no adequate explanation. A comparison of the St. Francois Mountain pole with similar‐age poles from Baltica, Siberia and Australia allow first‐order tests of proposed continental configurations. Paleomagnetic data from Australia are compatible with proposed Rodinia reconstructions, whereas paleomagnetic data from Baltica are not. We are unable to rigorously test the alternative suggestion that places Siberia against the western margin of Laurentia due in part to large errors associated with Siberian paleomagnetic data.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A paleomagnetic investigation of the St. Francois Mountains igneous province in southeastern Missouri provides a key 1476 ± 16 Ma paleomagnetic pole for Laurentia. The pole (13.2°S, 219.0°E; dp = 4.7°, dm = 8.0°) is considered primary on the basis of positive conglomerate, inverse baked contact, and fold tests. An analysis of 1470–1430 Ma poles from Laurentia highlights key differences between poles obtained from the Belt Supergroup, Electra Lake gabbro, and cratonic North America. Paleolatitudes based on the Lower Belt Supergroup poles are enigmatic, as two previous studies yielded a difference of 10°. Our new pole, combined with an analysis of previous results, favors the higher latitude interpretation for the Lower Belt Supergroup. Paleolatitudes from the younger Belt rocks indicate lower latitudes than coeval rocks from elsewhere in Laurentia for which there has been no adequate explanation. A comparison of the St. Francois Mountain pole with similar‐age poles from Baltica, Siberia and Australia allow first‐order tests of proposed continental configurations. Paleomagnetic data from Australia are compatible with proposed Rodinia reconstructions, whereas paleomagnetic data from Baltica are not. We are unable to rigorously test the alternative suggestion that places Siberia against the western margin of Laurentia due in part to large errors associated with Siberian paleomagnetic data.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 73 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A paleomagnetic investigation of the St. Francois Mountains igneous province in southeastern Missouri provides a key 1476 ± 16 Ma paleomagnetic pole for Laurentia. The pole (13.2°S, 219.0°E; dp = 4.7°, dm = 8.0°) is considered primary on the basis of positive conglomerate, inverse baked contact, and fold tests. An analysis of 1470–1430 Ma poles from Laurentia highlights key differences between poles obtained from the Belt Supergroup, Electra Lake gabbro, and cratonic North America. Paleolatitudes based on the Lower Belt Supergroup poles are enigmatic, as two previous studies yielded a difference of 10°. Our new pole, combined with an analysis of previous results, favors the higher latitude interpretation for the Lower Belt Supergroup. Paleolatitudes from the younger Belt rocks indicate lower latitudes than coeval rocks from elsewhere in Laurentia for which there has been no adequate explanation. A comparison of the St. Francois Mountain pole with similar‐age poles from Baltica, Siberia and Australia allow first‐order tests of proposed continental configurations. Paleomagnetic data from Australia are compatible with proposed Rodinia reconstructions, whereas paleomagnetic data from Baltica are not. We are unable to rigorously test the alternative suggestion that places Siberia against the western margin of Laurentia due in part to large errors associated with Siberian paleomagnetic data.

Key concepts: Laurentia, Paleomagnetism, Baltica, Geology, Rodinia, Apparent polar wander, Paleontology, Supergroup

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Revisiting the paleomagnetism of the 1.476 Ga St. Francois Mountains igneous province, Missouri — Research Paper | ScholarLens