2009PubMedRequires access

The predictive value of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid index, biophysical profile score, nonstress test and foetal movement chart for meconium-stained amniotic fluid in prolonged pregnancies.

Maryam Khooshideh, Shahrokh Izadi, Ali Shahriari, M Mirteymouri

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of non-stress test (NST), biophysical profile score (BPS), amniotic fluid index (AFI) and foetal movement charted (FMC) by mother in the prediction of meconium passage in post-date pregnancies. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study performed from 2003 to 2005, in the Ali-Ebne-Abitaleb Hospital, all post-date singleton pregnant women were included and evaluated a few hours before delivery for AFI, NST, BPS and FMC. Based on the results of the mentioned tests the occurrence of foetal distress was foreseen and the judgments were compared with the results of evaluation of the amniotic fluid after amniotomy during labour. Our judgment of occurrence of foetal distress was based on meconium staining of amniotic fluid (MSAF) as the gold standard. RESULTS: In this study 250 women were included. The sensitivity and specificity of these tests respectively were: 62% and 42% for NST, 66% and 56% for BPS, 38% and 83% for AFI and 44% and 64% for FMC. The highest positive predictive value was recorded respectively for AFI (52%) and negative predictive value was recorded for NST (94%). There was a significant association between MSAF and BPS. In univariate analyses, there was a significant association between MSAF and BPS (P = 0.010 for linear by linear association, exact method). Also there was a significant association between MSAF and AFI < 5 cm. (OR = 2.99, 95% CI, 1.57-5.74). CONCLUSION: Although BPS and AFI had the highest level of prediction, they are of limited usefulness in prediction of foetal distress. The reactive NST is more conclusive.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of non-stress test (NST), biophysical profile score (BPS), amniotic fluid index (AFI) and foetal movement charted (FMC) by mother in the prediction of meconium passage in post-date pregnancies. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study performed from 2003 to 2005, in the Ali-Ebne-Abitaleb Hospital, all post-date singleton pregnant women were included and evaluated a few hours before delivery for AFI, NST, BPS and FMC. Based on the results of the mentioned tests the occurrence of foetal distress was foreseen and the judgments were compared with the results of evaluation of the amniotic fluid after amniotomy during labour. Our judgment of occurrence of foetal distress was based on meconium staining of amniotic fluid (MSAF) as the gold standard. RESULTS: In this study 250 women were included. The sensitivity and specificity of these tests respectively were: 62% and 42% for NST, 66% and 56% for BPS, 38% and 83% for AFI and 44% and 64% for FMC. The highest positive predictive value was recorded respectively for AFI (52%) and negative predictive value was recorded for NST (94%). There was a significant association between MSAF and BPS. In univariate analyses, there was a significant association between MSAF and BPS (P = 0.010 for linear by linear association, exact method). Also there was a significant association between MSAF and AFI < 5 cm. (OR = 2.99, 95% CI, 1.57-5.74). CONCLUSION: Although BPS and AFI had the highest level of prediction, they are of limited usefulness in prediction of foetal distress. The reactive NST is more conclusive.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of non-stress test (NST), biophysical profile score (BPS), amniotic fluid index (AFI) and foetal movement charted (FMC) by mother in the prediction of meconium passage in post-date pregnancies. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study performed from 2003 to 2005, in the Ali-Ebne-Abitaleb Hospital, all post-date singleton pregnant women were included and evaluated a few hours before delivery for AFI, NST, BPS and FMC. Based on the results of the mentioned tests the occurrence of foetal distress was foreseen and the judgments were compared with the results of evaluation of the amniotic fluid after amniotomy during labour. Our judgment of occurrence of foetal distress was based on meconium staining of amniotic fluid (MSAF) as the gold standard. RESULTS: In this study 250 women were included. The sensitivity and specificity of these tests respectively were: 62% and 42% for NST, 66% and 56% for BPS, 38% and 83% for AFI and 44% and 64% for FMC. The highest positive predictive value was recorded respectively for AFI (52%) and negative predictive value was recorded for NST (94%). There was a significant association between MSAF and BPS. In univariate analyses, there was a significant association between MSAF and BPS (P = 0.010 for linear by linear association, exact method). Also there was a significant association between MSAF and AFI < 5 cm. (OR = 2.99, 95% CI, 1.57-5.74). CONCLUSION: Although BPS and AFI had the highest level of prediction, they are of limited usefulness in prediction of foetal distress. The reactive NST is more conclusive.

Key concepts: Medicine, Amniotic fluid index, Amniotic fluid, Nonstress test, Biophysical profile, Obstetrics, Meconium, Univariate analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The predictive value of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid index, biophysical profile score, nonstress test and foetal movement chart for meconium-stained amniotic fluid in prolonged pregnancies. — Research Paper | ScholarLens