2009Journal of Historical SociologyRequires access

Ways of Forgetting: Israel and the Obliterated Memory of the Palestinian Nakba

Uri Ram

Open publisher page 71 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study analyses national ways of forgetting. Following the eminent British Anthropologists Mary Douglas, I relate here to “forgetting” as “selective remembering, misremembering and disremembering” ( Douglas 2007 : 13). The case study offered here is that of the Israeli‐Jewish forgetting of the uprooting of the Palestinians in the war of 1948. This paper discusses three facets of the collective forgetting: Inthe first subchapterI analyze the foundations of the Israeli regime of forgetting and discern three mechanisms of removing from memory of selected events:narrative forgetting:the formation and dissemination of an historical narrative;physical forgetting:the destruction of physical remains; andsymbolic forgetting:the creation of a new symbolic geography of new places and street names. Inthe second subchapter, I look at the tenacious ambiguity that lies in the regime of forgetting, as it does not completely erase all the traces of the past. And finally, inthe third subchapter, I discuss the growth of subversive memory and counter‐memory that at least indicates the option of a future revision of the Israeli regime of forgetting.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This study analyses national ways of forgetting. Following the eminent British Anthropologists Mary Douglas, I relate here to “forgetting” as “selective remembering, misremembering and disremembering” ( Douglas 2007 : 13). The case study offered here is that of the Israeli‐Jewish forgetting of the uprooting of the Palestinians in the war of 1948. This paper discusses three facets of the collective forgetting: Inthe first subchapterI analyze the foundations of the Israeli regime of forgetting and discern three mechanisms of removing from memory of selected events:narrative forgetting:the formation and dissemination of an historical narrative;physical forgetting:the destruction of physical remains; andsymbolic forgetting:the creation of a new symbolic geography of new places and street names. Inthe second subchapter, I look at the tenacious ambiguity that lies in the regime of forgetting, as it does not completely erase all the traces of the past. And finally, inthe third subchapter, I discuss the growth of subversive memory and counter‐memory that at least indicates the option of a future revision of the Israeli regime of forgetting.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 71 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This study analyses national ways of forgetting. Following the eminent British Anthropologists Mary Douglas, I relate here to “forgetting” as “selective remembering, misremembering and disremembering” ( Douglas 2007 : 13). The case study offered here is that of the Israeli‐Jewish forgetting of the uprooting of the Palestinians in the war of 1948. This paper discusses three facets of the collective forgetting: Inthe first subchapterI analyze the foundations of the Israeli regime of forgetting and discern three mechanisms of removing from memory of selected events:narrative forgetting:the formation and dissemination of an historical narrative;physical forgetting:the destruction of physical remains; andsymbolic forgetting:the creation of a new symbolic geography of new places and street names. Inthe second subchapter, I look at the tenacious ambiguity that lies in the regime of forgetting, as it does not completely erase all the traces of the past. And finally, inthe third subchapter, I discuss the growth of subversive memory and counter‐memory that at least indicates the option of a future revision of the Israeli regime of forgetting.

Key concepts: Forgetting, Narrative, Collective memory, Ambiguity, History, Retrieval-induced forgetting, Aesthetics, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ways of Forgetting: Israel and the Obliterated Memory of the Palestinian Nakba — Research Paper | ScholarLens