2014Hong Kong Physiotherapy JournalOpen access

Effect of different combinations of physiotherapy treatment approaches on functional outcomes in stroke patients: A retrospective analysis

Bryan Ping Ho Chung

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

This retrospective study compared the functional outcomes among stroke patients who had received rehabilitation based on different physiotherapy treatment approaches. The participants were divided into three groups according to the physiotherapist in charge of their treatment. The primary treatment approaches applied in Group A, Group B, and Group C were the functional approach, the Bobath approach, and the motor learning approach, respectively. For each participant, the Berg's Balance Scale score, the Modified Barthel Index, and the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index were compared among these three groups prior to and after the stroke rehabilitation programme. Within-group analysis showed that Group A, Group B, and Group C participants had a statistically significant improvement in their Modified Barthel Index (p < 0.017). Group A and Group C participants had statistically significant improvements in their Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (p < 0.017). Only Group C participants had a statistically significant improvement in their Berg's Balance Scale score (p < 0.017). However, between-group analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the outcomes (p > 0.05). In summary, this study showed that different combinations of treatment approaches may induce similar improvement in functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This retrospective study compared the functional outcomes among stroke patients who had received rehabilitation based on different physiotherapy treatment approaches. The participants were divided into three groups according to the physiotherapist in charge of their treatment. The primary treatment approaches applied in Group A, Group B, and Group C were the functional approach, the Bobath approach, and the motor learning approach, respectively. For each participant, the Berg's Balance Scale score, the Modified Barthel Index, and the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index were compared among these three groups prior to and after the stroke rehabilitation programme. Within-group analysis showed that Group A, Group B, and Group C participants had a statistically significant improvement in their Modified Barthel Index (p < 0.017). Group A and Group C participants had statistically significant improvements in their Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (p < 0.017). Only Group C participants had a statistically significant improvement in their Berg's Balance Scale score (p < 0.017). However, between-group analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the outcomes (p > 0.05). In summary, this study showed that different combinations of treatment approaches may induce similar improvement in functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This retrospective study compared the functional outcomes among stroke patients who had received rehabilitation based on different physiotherapy treatment approaches. The participants were divided into three groups according to the physiotherapist in charge of their treatment. The primary treatment approaches applied in Group A, Group B, and Group C were the functional approach, the Bobath approach, and the motor learning approach, respectively. For each participant, the Berg's Balance Scale score, the Modified Barthel Index, and the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index were compared among these three groups prior to and after the stroke rehabilitation programme. Within-group analysis showed that Group A, Group B, and Group C participants had a statistically significant improvement in their Modified Barthel Index (p < 0.017). Group A and Group C participants had statistically significant improvements in their Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (p < 0.017). Only Group C participants had a statistically significant improvement in their Berg's Balance Scale score (p < 0.017). However, between-group analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the outcomes (p > 0.05). In summary, this study showed that different combinations of treatment approaches may induce similar improvement in functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation.

Key concepts: Rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire, Berg Balance Scale, Medicine, Physical therapy, Barthel index, Rehabilitation, Balance (ability), Stroke (engine)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of different combinations of physiotherapy treatment approaches on functional outcomes in stroke patients: A retrospective analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens