2011Nanfang nongye xuebaoRequires access

Efficiency of five biological pesticides in controlling Cnaphalocrocis medinalis in rice fields.

Wei Qiao-xian, Liao Shichun, Li Liufeng, Fengying Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

[Objective]The objective of current study was to determine the efficiency of five biological pesticides for controlling Cnaphalocrocis medinalis in order to screen a biological pesticides which could be used as an alternative to chemical pesticides for controlling C. medinalis. [Method]Three levels (high, moderate and low treatment) of biological pesticides (spinetoram SC, Bacillus thuringiensis SC, abamectin WDG, proclaim OR and powder of Beauveria bassiana WDG) were used as treatment to compare their effects with recommended levels of common chemical pesticides and controls. [Result]After 12 days of pesticide treatments, the control efficiency of spinetoram SC (6%), Bacillus thuringiensis (BT) SC (8000 IU/μL), abamectin WDG (10%), proclaim OR(banleptm)(2%) and powder of Beauveria bassiana WDG (40 billion spores/g) was recorded in range of 97.45-98.89%, 81.31-91.68%, 77.27-90.61%, 79.62-89.21% and 75.62-86.54%, respectively. [Conclusion]Compared with chemical pesticides, five tested biological pesticides showed similar or higher efficiency in controlling C. medinalis. Instead of chemical pesticides, these bio-pesticides may be used to control C. medinalis in rice fields.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Objective]The objective of current study was to determine the efficiency of five biological pesticides for controlling Cnaphalocrocis medinalis in order to screen a biological pesticides which could be used as an alternative to chemical pesticides for controlling C. medinalis. [Method]Three levels (high, moderate and low treatment) of biological pesticides (spinetoram SC, Bacillus thuringiensis SC, abamectin WDG, proclaim OR and powder of Beauveria bassiana WDG) were used as treatment to compare their effects with recommended levels of common chemical pesticides and controls. [Result]After 12 days of pesticide treatments, the control efficiency of spinetoram SC (6%), Bacillus thuringiensis (BT) SC (8000 IU/μL), abamectin WDG (10%), proclaim OR(banleptm)(2%) and powder of Beauveria bassiana WDG (40 billion spores/g) was recorded in range of 97.45-98.89%, 81.31-91.68%, 77.27-90.61%, 79.62-89.21% and 75.62-86.54%, respectively. [Conclusion]Compared with chemical pesticides, five tested biological pesticides showed similar or higher efficiency in controlling C. medinalis. Instead of chemical pesticides, these bio-pesticides may be used to control C. medinalis in rice fields.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Objective]The objective of current study was to determine the efficiency of five biological pesticides for controlling Cnaphalocrocis medinalis in order to screen a biological pesticides which could be used as an alternative to chemical pesticides for controlling C. medinalis. [Method]Three levels (high, moderate and low treatment) of biological pesticides (spinetoram SC, Bacillus thuringiensis SC, abamectin WDG, proclaim OR and powder of Beauveria bassiana WDG) were used as treatment to compare their effects with recommended levels of common chemical pesticides and controls. [Result]After 12 days of pesticide treatments, the control efficiency of spinetoram SC (6%), Bacillus thuringiensis (BT) SC (8000 IU/μL), abamectin WDG (10%), proclaim OR(banleptm)(2%) and powder of Beauveria bassiana WDG (40 billion spores/g) was recorded in range of 97.45-98.89%, 81.31-91.68%, 77.27-90.61%, 79.62-89.21% and 75.62-86.54%, respectively. [Conclusion]Compared with chemical pesticides, five tested biological pesticides showed similar or higher efficiency in controlling C. medinalis. Instead of chemical pesticides, these bio-pesticides may be used to control C. medinalis in rice fields.

Key concepts: Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, Pesticide, Biopesticide, Abamectin, Bacillus thuringiensis, Beauveria bassiana, Toxicology, Biological pest control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficiency of five biological pesticides in controlling Cnaphalocrocis medinalis in rice fields. — Research Paper | ScholarLens