2012International Journal of Public Opinion ResearchRequires access

The Duality of Agenda-Setting: The Role of Information Processing

Kristin Bulkow, Jürgen Urban, Wolfgang Schweiger

Open publisher page 58 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to investigate the dual nature of agenda-setting processes as they can either occur on a deliberate level or on an automatic one. At present, the factors that lead to one of the processes rather than to the other are almost unknown. From studies on dual processing theories comes evidence that whether information is processed with high or with low cognitive effort strongly depends on the involvement with a certain issue. For that, we assume that the duality of agenda-setting reflects an involvement-determined duality of the underlying learning processes. In line with dual processing theories, we assume a more thoughtful agenda-setting process, if issue involvement is high and a more automatic one, if issue involvement is low. We tested these assumptions with two experimental panel studies. It can be concluded that the duality of agenda-setting processes is a result of different types of information processing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this article is to investigate the dual nature of agenda-setting processes as they can either occur on a deliberate level or on an automatic one. At present, the factors that lead to one of the processes rather than to the other are almost unknown. From studies on dual processing theories comes evidence that whether information is processed with high or with low cognitive effort strongly depends on the involvement with a certain issue. For that, we assume that the duality of agenda-setting reflects an involvement-determined duality of the underlying learning processes. In line with dual processing theories, we assume a more thoughtful agenda-setting process, if issue involvement is high and a more automatic one, if issue involvement is low. We tested these assumptions with two experimental panel studies. It can be concluded that the duality of agenda-setting processes is a result of different types of information processing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 58 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this article is to investigate the dual nature of agenda-setting processes as they can either occur on a deliberate level or on an automatic one. At present, the factors that lead to one of the processes rather than to the other are almost unknown. From studies on dual processing theories comes evidence that whether information is processed with high or with low cognitive effort strongly depends on the involvement with a certain issue. For that, we assume that the duality of agenda-setting reflects an involvement-determined duality of the underlying learning processes. In line with dual processing theories, we assume a more thoughtful agenda-setting process, if issue involvement is high and a more automatic one, if issue involvement is low. We tested these assumptions with two experimental panel studies. It can be concluded that the duality of agenda-setting processes is a result of different types of information processing.

Key concepts: Duality (order theory), Dual (grammatical number), Information processing, Dual process theory (moral psychology), Process (computing), Cognition, Dual role, Information processing theory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Duality of Agenda-Setting: The Role of Information Processing — Research Paper | ScholarLens