Discussion of B.P. Dhorenwend: “Psychology, psychologists and psychiatric epidemiology”
Assen Jablensky
Abstract
Assen Jablensky
Abstract
ABSTRACT The author emphasizes the importance of earlier epidemiological studies and finds it a rather one‐sided view that psychiatric epidemiology, prior to DSM‐III and the ECA studies was in a pre‐scientific stage. In addition to the areas of interface between psychology and psychiatric epidemiology mentioned by Dohrenwend he adds the following areas: crosscultural studies, studies of gene‐environment interactions, the epidemiological validation of diagnostic and classification systems, and the study of the impact of various treatment and service systems and therapeutic approaches on the epidemiology of mental disorders.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
ABSTRACT The author emphasizes the importance of earlier epidemiological studies and finds it a rather one‐sided view that psychiatric epidemiology, prior to DSM‐III and the ECA studies was in a pre‐scientific stage. In addition to the areas of interface between psychology and psychiatric epidemiology mentioned by Dohrenwend he adds the following areas: crosscultural studies, studies of gene‐environment interactions, the epidemiological validation of diagnostic and classification systems, and the study of the impact of various treatment and service systems and therapeutic approaches on the epidemiology of mental disorders.
Key concepts: Epidemiology, Psychiatric epidemiology, Psychiatry, Psychology, Medicine, Clinical psychology, Pathology