Proposed Fire Safety Ranking System EB-FSRS for Existing High-Rise Nonresidential Buildings in Hong Kong
W. K. Chow
Abstract
W. K. Chow
Abstract
A Fire Safety Ranking System (EB-FSRS) is proposed for assessing the fire safety provisions in existing high-rise nonresidential buildings in Hong Kong. The objective is to investigate how far the fire safety provisions in those existing buildings deviate from the expectation of new codes. Suitable fire safety management can then be worked out in the transition period, based on the scores. Local fire codes were reviewed first to decide what should be the attributes and their weightings. From the reviewing results, three groups of attributes were proposed in the EB-FSRS. These are the passive building construction, active fire protection systems (fire services installation), and key risk parameters, all following the local fire safety requirements. The concept is similar to those equivalent concepts on fire safety parameters of the National Fire Protection Association–Fire Safety Evaluation System (NFPA-FSES). But the EB-FSRS is not a “trade-off” exercise. Thirty-seven old high-rise buildings were rated by studying their architectural features, interior details, and fire safety provisions. Scores under EB-FSES and NFPA-FSES are also compared.
OpenAlex reports 55 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A Fire Safety Ranking System (EB-FSRS) is proposed for assessing the fire safety provisions in existing high-rise nonresidential buildings in Hong Kong. The objective is to investigate how far the fire safety provisions in those existing buildings deviate from the expectation of new codes. Suitable fire safety management can then be worked out in the transition period, based on the scores. Local fire codes were reviewed first to decide what should be the attributes and their weightings. From the reviewing results, three groups of attributes were proposed in the EB-FSRS. These are the passive building construction, active fire protection systems (fire services installation), and key risk parameters, all following the local fire safety requirements. The concept is similar to those equivalent concepts on fire safety parameters of the National Fire Protection Association–Fire Safety Evaluation System (NFPA-FSES). But the EB-FSRS is not a “trade-off” exercise. Thirty-seven old high-rise buildings were rated by studying their architectural features, interior details, and fire safety provisions. Scores under EB-FSES and NFPA-FSES are also compared.
Key concepts: Fire safety, Fire protection, Architectural engineering, Ranking (information retrieval), Key (lock), Engineering, Transport engineering, Forensic engineering