Consensus Rulemaking at the Federal Railroad Administration All Aboard for Railway Safety Measures
G C Cothen, C F Schulte, Jessica Horn, David C. Tyrell
Abstract
G C Cothen, C F Schulte, Jessica Horn, David C. Tyrell
Abstract
Because of the success of working groups, as well as roundtable discussions, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) changed the traditional hear-and-decide regulatory procedure for railroad safety into a consensus model involving the parties that are benefited or burdened by the regulations. This article presents accounts and lessons from two noteworthy rulemaking successes, plus insights into the unique and balanced workings of the Railroad Safety Advisory Committee.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Because of the success of working groups, as well as roundtable discussions, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) changed the traditional hear-and-decide regulatory procedure for railroad safety into a consensus model involving the parties that are benefited or burdened by the regulations. This article presents accounts and lessons from two noteworthy rulemaking successes, plus insights into the unique and balanced workings of the Railroad Safety Advisory Committee.
Key concepts: Rulemaking, Administration (probate law), Public administration, Business, Advisory committee, Political science, Engineering, Law