1965British Journal of RadiologyRequires access

Experiments with Fractionated X-irradiation of the Skin of Pigs II. – Fractionation up to Five Days

Jack F. Fowler, D. K. Bewley, R. L. Morgan, Jocelyn A. Silvester

Open publisher page 58 citations

Abstract

Fifteen fields on one pig were irradiated with 1, 2, 2, 3 and 5 fractions in 1, 5, 2, 3 and 5 days respectively. Skin reactions were recorded up to 80 or 100 days, so that the doses which produced equal reactions could be assessed. Three degrees of damage were analysed for early, medium and late reactions. As an example, the doses to produce one level of reaction over 30–85 days were respectively 2,050, 2,560–2,750, 2,750, 3,360 and 4,060 rads for the fractions listed above. The corresponding values of “DQ” = (Dn — D1)/(n —; 1) were high, 500–700 rads. The values of (Dn − D1)/(n − 1) became smaller with larger numbers of fractions. Two pigs were irradiated to investigate the “reciprocal vicinity” effect. It was found to be small for the field arrangements used, but the sensitivity of pig skin increased in the dorso-ventral direction and corrections were sometimes necessary. Two pigs were irradiated with pairs of equal doses separated by 0 to 24 hours. A recovery pattern was observed similar to that found in cell culture by Elkind and Sutton (1959), but less well resolved. It is not established that skin damage is entirely due to loss of cellular reproductive integrity, but from the practical point of view the empirical relation between dose and skin damage in pigs is similar to that found in patients, and is in agreement with other work on mouse skin and mouse intestinal death, but not with cell survival work on haemopoietic cells.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fifteen fields on one pig were irradiated with 1, 2, 2, 3 and 5 fractions in 1, 5, 2, 3 and 5 days respectively. Skin reactions were recorded up to 80 or 100 days, so that the doses which produced equal reactions could be assessed. Three degrees of damage were analysed for early, medium and late reactions. As an example, the doses to produce one level of reaction over 30–85 days were respectively 2,050, 2,560–2,750, 2,750, 3,360 and 4,060 rads for the fractions listed above. The corresponding values of “DQ” = (Dn — D1)/(n —; 1) were high, 500–700 rads. The values of (Dn − D1)/(n − 1) became smaller with larger numbers of fractions. Two pigs were irradiated to investigate the “reciprocal vicinity” effect. It was found to be small for the field arrangements used, but the sensitivity of pig skin increased in the dorso-ventral direction and corrections were sometimes necessary. Two pigs were irradiated with pairs of equal doses separated by 0 to 24 hours. A recovery pattern was observed similar to that found in cell culture by Elkind and Sutton (1959), but less well resolved. It is not established that skin damage is entirely due to loss of cellular reproductive integrity, but from the practical point of view the empirical relation between dose and skin damage in pigs is similar to that found in patients, and is in agreement with other work on mouse skin and mouse intestinal death, but not with cell survival work on haemopoietic cells.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 58 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fifteen fields on one pig were irradiated with 1, 2, 2, 3 and 5 fractions in 1, 5, 2, 3 and 5 days respectively. Skin reactions were recorded up to 80 or 100 days, so that the doses which produced equal reactions could be assessed. Three degrees of damage were analysed for early, medium and late reactions. As an example, the doses to produce one level of reaction over 30–85 days were respectively 2,050, 2,560–2,750, 2,750, 3,360 and 4,060 rads for the fractions listed above. The corresponding values of “DQ” = (Dn — D1)/(n —; 1) were high, 500–700 rads. The values of (Dn − D1)/(n − 1) became smaller with larger numbers of fractions. Two pigs were irradiated to investigate the “reciprocal vicinity” effect. It was found to be small for the field arrangements used, but the sensitivity of pig skin increased in the dorso-ventral direction and corrections were sometimes necessary. Two pigs were irradiated with pairs of equal doses separated by 0 to 24 hours. A recovery pattern was observed similar to that found in cell culture by Elkind and Sutton (1959), but less well resolved. It is not established that skin damage is entirely due to loss of cellular reproductive integrity, but from the practical point of view the empirical relation between dose and skin damage in pigs is similar to that found in patients, and is in agreement with other work on mouse skin and mouse intestinal death, but not with cell survival work on haemopoietic cells.

Key concepts: Pig skin, Irradiation, Fractionation, Skin reaction, Dose fractionation, Andrology, Nuclear medicine, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experiments with Fractionated X-irradiation of the Skin of Pigs II. – Fractionation up to Five Days — Research Paper | ScholarLens