James E. Tomberlin
Abstract
In a recent symposium on Descartes' ontological argument, Norman Malcolm has restated a rather ingenious version of St Anse1m's ontological argument.1The purpose of the present paper is to assess the merits of this particular version of the ontological argument.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In a recent symposium on Descartes' ontological argument, Norman Malcolm has restated a rather ingenious version of St Anse1m's ontological argument.1The purpose of the present paper is to assess the merits of this particular version of the ontological argument.
Key concepts: Argument (complex analysis), Ontological argument, Philosophy, Epistemology, Philosophy of religion, Medicine, Internal medicine