2002Journal of Epidemiology & Community HealthOpen access

Does a higher number of siblings protect against the development of allergy and asthma? A review

Wilfried Karmaus, C Botezan

Open full text 322 citations

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review the "protective" effects of having a higher number of siblings for the risk of atopic eczema, asthma wheezing, hay fever, and allergic sensitisation. METHOD: Review of the literature (Medline since 1965 and references). MAIN RESULTS: 53 different studies were identified. For eczema, 9 of 11 studies reported an inverse relation with number of siblings; for asthma and wheezing, 21 of 31 reported the inverse association; for hay fever, all 17 studies showed the effect; for allergic sensitisation or immunoglobulin E reactivity 14 of 16 studies supported the "protective" effect of a higher number of siblings. The studies emphasise a "theory" that is based exclusively on epidemiological associations. CONCLUSIONS: Research has not yet answered the question of which causal factors explain the sibling effect. Causal factors must meet two criteria; they must vary with sibship size and they must protect against atopic manifestations. The prevailing "hygiene hypothesis" failed to explain the findings adequately. Alternative explanations include in utero programming or endocrine explanatory models. The epidemiology research into siblings and atopic disorders has entered an intellectually challenging phase. Possessing sufficient knowledge about the causal factors might prevent at least 30% of all cases of asthma, eczema, and hay fever.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review the "protective" effects of having a higher number of siblings for the risk of atopic eczema, asthma wheezing, hay fever, and allergic sensitisation. METHOD: Review of the literature (Medline since 1965 and references). MAIN RESULTS: 53 different studies were identified. For eczema, 9 of 11 studies reported an inverse relation with number of siblings; for asthma and wheezing, 21 of 31 reported the inverse association; for hay fever, all 17 studies showed the effect; for allergic sensitisation or immunoglobulin E reactivity 14 of 16 studies supported the "protective" effect of a higher number of siblings. The studies emphasise a "theory" that is based exclusively on epidemiological associations. CONCLUSIONS: Research has not yet answered the question of which causal factors explain the sibling effect. Causal factors must meet two criteria; they must vary with sibship size and they must protect against atopic manifestations. The prevailing "hygiene hypothesis" failed to explain the findings adequately. Alternative explanations include in utero programming or endocrine explanatory models. The epidemiology research into siblings and atopic disorders has entered an intellectually challenging phase. Possessing sufficient knowledge about the causal factors might prevent at least 30% of all cases of asthma, eczema, and hay fever.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 322 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review the "protective" effects of having a higher number of siblings for the risk of atopic eczema, asthma wheezing, hay fever, and allergic sensitisation. METHOD: Review of the literature (Medline since 1965 and references). MAIN RESULTS: 53 different studies were identified. For eczema, 9 of 11 studies reported an inverse relation with number of siblings; for asthma and wheezing, 21 of 31 reported the inverse association; for hay fever, all 17 studies showed the effect; for allergic sensitisation or immunoglobulin E reactivity 14 of 16 studies supported the "protective" effect of a higher number of siblings. The studies emphasise a "theory" that is based exclusively on epidemiological associations. CONCLUSIONS: Research has not yet answered the question of which causal factors explain the sibling effect. Causal factors must meet two criteria; they must vary with sibship size and they must protect against atopic manifestations. The prevailing "hygiene hypothesis" failed to explain the findings adequately. Alternative explanations include in utero programming or endocrine explanatory models. The epidemiology research into siblings and atopic disorders has entered an intellectually challenging phase. Possessing sufficient knowledge about the causal factors might prevent at least 30% of all cases of asthma, eczema, and hay fever.

Key concepts: Hay fever, Medicine, Hygiene hypothesis, Asthma, Atopy, Epidemiology, Sibling, Allergy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does a higher number of siblings protect against the development of allergy and asthma? A review — Research Paper | ScholarLens