1963GeneticsRequires access

GENETIC STUDIES OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA: DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA, A LARGE DOMINANT POPULATION

Wilson S. Stone, Florence D. Wilson, Virginia L. Gerstenberg

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

FOR several years members of this laboratory have studied the genetic structure of Drosophila populations. None of these populations has been a large dominant continental population. PROFESSOR TH. DOBZHANSKY and his colleagues have analyzed samplemf Drosophila willistoni, the major Neotropical Drosophila with the largest population of any Drosophila known, and Drosophila pseudoobscura, which is the dominant population in numbers and distribution in the western United States and extends through Mexico and Guatemala. The studies with D. pseudoobscura are summarized and extended by DOBZHANSKY, SPASSKY and TIDWELL (1963 and references therein). PROFESSOR DOBZHANSKY spent the summer of 1961 in Arizona collecting and analyzing populations of D. pseudoobscura. He provided this laboratory with large samples of two of the populations he was testing and DR. WILLIAM B. HEED collected two other populations of D. pseudoobscura so that there were four samples from as many localities to compare. These parallel investigations on samples of the same population have the added advantage that one can compare directly the results of the two methods of analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS

About this research paper

What this paper is about

FOR several years members of this laboratory have studied the genetic structure of Drosophila populations. None of these populations has been a large dominant continental population. PROFESSOR TH. DOBZHANSKY and his colleagues have analyzed samplemf Drosophila willistoni, the major Neotropical Drosophila with the largest population of any Drosophila known, and Drosophila pseudoobscura, which is the dominant population in numbers and distribution in the western United States and extends through Mexico and Guatemala. The studies with D. pseudoobscura are summarized and extended by DOBZHANSKY, SPASSKY and TIDWELL (1963 and references therein). PROFESSOR DOBZHANSKY spent the summer of 1961 in Arizona collecting and analyzing populations of D. pseudoobscura. He provided this laboratory with large samples of two of the populations he was testing and DR. WILLIAM B. HEED collected two other populations of D. pseudoobscura so that there were four samples from as many localities to compare. These parallel investigations on samples of the same population have the added advantage that one can compare directly the results of the two methods of analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

FOR several years members of this laboratory have studied the genetic structure of Drosophila populations. None of these populations has been a large dominant continental population. PROFESSOR TH. DOBZHANSKY and his colleagues have analyzed samplemf Drosophila willistoni, the major Neotropical Drosophila with the largest population of any Drosophila known, and Drosophila pseudoobscura, which is the dominant population in numbers and distribution in the western United States and extends through Mexico and Guatemala. The studies with D. pseudoobscura are summarized and extended by DOBZHANSKY, SPASSKY and TIDWELL (1963 and references therein). PROFESSOR DOBZHANSKY spent the summer of 1961 in Arizona collecting and analyzing populations of D. pseudoobscura. He provided this laboratory with large samples of two of the populations he was testing and DR. WILLIAM B. HEED collected two other populations of D. pseudoobscura so that there were four samples from as many localities to compare. These parallel investigations on samples of the same population have the added advantage that one can compare directly the results of the two methods of analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Key concepts: Drosophila pseudoobscura, Biology, Drosophila (subgenus), Genetics, Evolutionary biology, Population, Natural population growth, Drosophila melanogaster

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
GENETIC STUDIES OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA: DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA, A LARGE DOMINANT POPULATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens