MR Imaging of Lipoma and Liposarcoma
H Einarsdottir, Veli Söderlund, Ola Larson, G. Jenner, Henrik C. F. Bauer
Abstract
H Einarsdottir, Veli Söderlund, Ola Larson, G. Jenner, Henrik C. F. Bauer
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether lipoma, atypical lipomatous tumors, and liposarcomas can be differentiated by MR images. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The MR images of 59 lipomatous lesions and liposarcomas were retrospectively reviewed. Apart from size, surgical site, location and margins, the percentage of fat of the tumor volume was assessed as none, 1-75%, 75-95%, or 95-100%. RESULTS: None of the 18 liposarcomas contained fat that could be recognized by MR imaging. The 3 atypical lipomatous tumors all contained fat but less than 75% of the tumor volume. In 32 of 38 ordinary lipomas, the percentage of fat was 95-100%, and in 4 less than 95% of the tumor volume. Two lipomas did not contain fat that could be recognized by MR imaging. CONCLUSION: A lesion which predominantly has a fat signal is, in all probability, an ordinary lipoma. Lesions with less fat, but still mostly fatty, may either be lipoma or atypical lipomatous tumor. In this group, the discrimination between these two entities cannot be based upon imaging features. In the absence of a fat signal, liposarcoma or lipoma cannot be differentiated from other soft tissue tumors.
OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether lipoma, atypical lipomatous tumors, and liposarcomas can be differentiated by MR images. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The MR images of 59 lipomatous lesions and liposarcomas were retrospectively reviewed. Apart from size, surgical site, location and margins, the percentage of fat of the tumor volume was assessed as none, 1-75%, 75-95%, or 95-100%. RESULTS: None of the 18 liposarcomas contained fat that could be recognized by MR imaging. The 3 atypical lipomatous tumors all contained fat but less than 75% of the tumor volume. In 32 of 38 ordinary lipomas, the percentage of fat was 95-100%, and in 4 less than 95% of the tumor volume. Two lipomas did not contain fat that could be recognized by MR imaging. CONCLUSION: A lesion which predominantly has a fat signal is, in all probability, an ordinary lipoma. Lesions with less fat, but still mostly fatty, may either be lipoma or atypical lipomatous tumor. In this group, the discrimination between these two entities cannot be based upon imaging features. In the absence of a fat signal, liposarcoma or lipoma cannot be differentiated from other soft tissue tumors.
Key concepts: Lipoma, Liposarcoma, Medicine, Lesion, Soft tissue, Magnetic resonance imaging, Pathology, Myxoid liposarcoma