Nitrogen gaseous emissions from farm effluent application to pastures and mitigation measures to reduce the emissions: a review
Junyi Li, Jiafa Luo, Yali Shi, D. J. Houlbrooke, L Wang, Stuart Lindsey, Y Li
Abstract
Open-access reader
Junyi Li, Jiafa Luo, Yali Shi, D. J. Houlbrooke, L Wang, Stuart Lindsey, Y Li
Abstract
Open-access reader
Potential losses of nitrogen (N) from land application of effluents include ammonia (NH 3 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions. In this review paper, the extent of the NH 3 and N 2 O losses resulting from application of effluents to pastoral soils is assessed. Nitrogen losses, as NH 3 and N 2 O, from applied effluent to pastoral soil ranged from 1%–66% and <0.1%–6% of the applied N, respectively. The potential mitigation methods include: reducing livestock numbers; lowering N content of the effluent; using N process inhibitors; optimising timing of effluent application; and applying effluent at rates that match plant uptake. It is important to remember that some of these options can result in ‘pollution swapping’ and some of them are in the early stages of development. Future research needs to focus on the overall impact of mitigation options on the whole suite of gaseous emissions and the practicality of those options.
OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Potential losses of nitrogen (N) from land application of effluents include ammonia (NH 3 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions. In this review paper, the extent of the NH 3 and N 2 O losses resulting from application of effluents to pastoral soils is assessed. Nitrogen losses, as NH 3 and N 2 O, from applied effluent to pastoral soil ranged from 1%–66% and <0.1%–6% of the applied N, respectively. The potential mitigation methods include: reducing livestock numbers; lowering N content of the effluent; using N process inhibitors; optimising timing of effluent application; and applying effluent at rates that match plant uptake. It is important to remember that some of these options can result in ‘pollution swapping’ and some of them are in the early stages of development. Future research needs to focus on the overall impact of mitigation options on the whole suite of gaseous emissions and the practicality of those options.
Key concepts: Effluent, Environmental science, Nitrous oxide, Pollution, Nitrogen, Environmental engineering, Chemistry, Ecology