2015New Zealand Journal of Agricultural ResearchOpen access

Nitrogen gaseous emissions from farm effluent application to pastures and mitigation measures to reduce the emissions: a review

Junyi Li, Jiafa Luo, Yali Shi, D. J. Houlbrooke, L Wang, Stuart Lindsey, Y Li

Open full text 19 citations

Abstract

Potential losses of nitrogen (N) from land application of effluents include ammonia (NH 3 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions. In this review paper, the extent of the NH 3 and N 2 O losses resulting from application of effluents to pastoral soils is assessed. Nitrogen losses, as NH 3 and N 2 O, from applied effluent to pastoral soil ranged from 1%–66% and <0.1%–6% of the applied N, respectively. The potential mitigation methods include: reducing livestock numbers; lowering N content of the effluent; using N process inhibitors; optimising timing of effluent application; and applying effluent at rates that match plant uptake. It is important to remember that some of these options can result in ‘pollution swapping’ and some of them are in the early stages of development. Future research needs to focus on the overall impact of mitigation options on the whole suite of gaseous emissions and the practicality of those options.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Potential losses of nitrogen (N) from land application of effluents include ammonia (NH 3 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions. In this review paper, the extent of the NH 3 and N 2 O losses resulting from application of effluents to pastoral soils is assessed. Nitrogen losses, as NH 3 and N 2 O, from applied effluent to pastoral soil ranged from 1%–66% and <0.1%–6% of the applied N, respectively. The potential mitigation methods include: reducing livestock numbers; lowering N content of the effluent; using N process inhibitors; optimising timing of effluent application; and applying effluent at rates that match plant uptake. It is important to remember that some of these options can result in ‘pollution swapping’ and some of them are in the early stages of development. Future research needs to focus on the overall impact of mitigation options on the whole suite of gaseous emissions and the practicality of those options.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Potential losses of nitrogen (N) from land application of effluents include ammonia (NH 3 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions. In this review paper, the extent of the NH 3 and N 2 O losses resulting from application of effluents to pastoral soils is assessed. Nitrogen losses, as NH 3 and N 2 O, from applied effluent to pastoral soil ranged from 1%–66% and <0.1%–6% of the applied N, respectively. The potential mitigation methods include: reducing livestock numbers; lowering N content of the effluent; using N process inhibitors; optimising timing of effluent application; and applying effluent at rates that match plant uptake. It is important to remember that some of these options can result in ‘pollution swapping’ and some of them are in the early stages of development. Future research needs to focus on the overall impact of mitigation options on the whole suite of gaseous emissions and the practicality of those options.

Key concepts: Effluent, Environmental science, Nitrous oxide, Pollution, Nitrogen, Environmental engineering, Chemistry, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nitrogen gaseous emissions from farm effluent application to pastures and mitigation measures to reduce the emissions: a review — Research Paper | ScholarLens