2012Journal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyOpen access

Once- versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir tablets in virologically suppressed, HIV-infected, treatment-experienced children: comparative pharmacokinetics and virological outcome after switching to once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir

Kulkunya Chokephaibulkit, Maneeratn Nuntarukchaikul, Wanatpreeya Phongsamart, Orasri Wittawatmongkol, Keswadee Lapphra, Nirun Vanprapar, Tim R. Cressey

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Data on lopinavir/ritonavir tablets administered once daily in children are limited. We compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily versus once daily in virologically suppressed, HIV-infected children, and assessed the virological outcome, at 48 weeks, in children receiving the regimen of lopinavir/ritonavir once daily. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HIV-infected children receiving a twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen and with an HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) <40 copies/mL for at least 3 months were enrolled. Intensive steady-state 12 h blood sampling for PK assessment was performed at enrolment. Immediately afterwards, the lopinavir/ritonavir dose was changed to once daily with the equivalent daily dose, and intensive steady-state 24 h blood sampling was repeated 2 weeks later. If the lopinavir C(trough) was <1.0 μg/mL, the lopinavir/ritonavir dose was increased by 20%-30% and C(trough) measurement repeated. CD4 cell counts and VL were determined at baseline and at 12, 24 and 48 weeks. RESULTS: Twelve children were enrolled. The median age was 13.1 years. Lopinavir AUC(0-24) following twice-daily and once-daily dosing was 169.7 (124.0-200.8) and 167.1 (95.1-228.1) μg · h/mL, respectively. Seven children, including all six concomitantly receiving efavirenz, had a C(trough) <1.0 μg/mL with once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir dosing, and four of seven children had a C(trough) <1.0 μg/mL after dose adjustment. All children maintained virological suppression throughout the 48 week period. CONCLUSIONS: Lopinavir/ritonavir-based once-daily regimens could simplify therapy in children/adolescents with virological control, but a lower lopinavir C(trough) was evident. Further efficacy studies of lopinavir/ritonavir once daily in children are necessary before routinely recommending this dosing strategy.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: Data on lopinavir/ritonavir tablets administered once daily in children are limited. We compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily versus once daily in virologically suppressed, HIV-infected children, and assessed the virological outcome, at 48 weeks, in children receiving the regimen of lopinavir/ritonavir once daily. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HIV-infected children receiving a twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen and with an HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) <40 copies/mL for at least 3 months were enrolled. Intensive steady-state 12 h blood sampling for PK assessment was performed at enrolment. Immediately afterwards, the lopinavir/ritonavir dose was changed to once daily with the equivalent daily dose, and intensive steady-state 24 h blood sampling was repeated 2 weeks later. If the lopinavir C(trough) was <1.0 μg/mL, the lopinavir/ritonavir dose was increased by 20%-30% and C(trough) measurement repeated. CD4 cell counts and VL were determined at baseline and at 12, 24 and 48 weeks. RESULTS: Twelve children were enrolled. The median age was 13.1 years. Lopinavir AUC(0-24) following twice-daily and once-daily dosing was 169.7 (124.0-200.8) and 167.1 (95.1-228.1) μg · h/mL, respectively. Seven children, including all six concomitantly receiving efavirenz, had a C(trough) <1.0 μg/mL with once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir dosing, and four of seven children had a C(trough) <1.0 μg/mL after dose adjustment. All children maintained virological suppression throughout the 48 week period. CONCLUSIONS: Lopinavir/ritonavir-based once-daily regimens could simplify therapy in children/adolescents with virological control, but a lower lopinavir C(trough) was evident. Further efficacy studies of lopinavir/ritonavir once daily in children are necessary before routinely recommending this dosing strategy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: Data on lopinavir/ritonavir tablets administered once daily in children are limited. We compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily versus once daily in virologically suppressed, HIV-infected children, and assessed the virological outcome, at 48 weeks, in children receiving the regimen of lopinavir/ritonavir once daily. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HIV-infected children receiving a twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen and with an HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) <40 copies/mL for at least 3 months were enrolled. Intensive steady-state 12 h blood sampling for PK assessment was performed at enrolment. Immediately afterwards, the lopinavir/ritonavir dose was changed to once daily with the equivalent daily dose, and intensive steady-state 24 h blood sampling was repeated 2 weeks later. If the lopinavir C(trough) was <1.0 μg/mL, the lopinavir/ritonavir dose was increased by 20%-30% and C(trough) measurement repeated. CD4 cell counts and VL were determined at baseline and at 12, 24 and 48 weeks. RESULTS: Twelve children were enrolled. The median age was 13.1 years. Lopinavir AUC(0-24) following twice-daily and once-daily dosing was 169.7 (124.0-200.8) and 167.1 (95.1-228.1) μg · h/mL, respectively. Seven children, including all six concomitantly receiving efavirenz, had a C(trough) <1.0 μg/mL with once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir dosing, and four of seven children had a C(trough) <1.0 μg/mL after dose adjustment. All children maintained virological suppression throughout the 48 week period. CONCLUSIONS: Lopinavir/ritonavir-based once-daily regimens could simplify therapy in children/adolescents with virological control, but a lower lopinavir C(trough) was evident. Further efficacy studies of lopinavir/ritonavir once daily in children are necessary before routinely recommending this dosing strategy.

Key concepts: Lopinavir, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Ritonavir, Medicine, Pharmacokinetics, Regimen, Pharmacology, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Once- versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir tablets in virologically suppressed, HIV-infected, treatment-experienced children: comparative pharmacokinetics and virological outcome after switching to once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir — Research Paper | ScholarLens