1987Cancer InvestigationRequires access

Vinblastine Infusion in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas: Lack of Total Cross-Resistance with Vincristine

Don V. Jackson, Charles L. Spurr, M Caponera, Dougľas R. White, Hyman B. Muss, Michael D. Pavy, George P. Sartiano, Patricia J. Zekan, Ervin Hire

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Historically, vinblastine given by intravenous bolus injection has not been an effective treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas; vincristine has displayed greater activity. Also, vinblastine has generally been considered to be cross-resistant with vincristine in such patients. In an attempt to overcome these obstacles, a protracted infusion of vinblastine was administered (0.5-1.5 mg/m2 per day for 5 days) and repeated every 3 weeks. Partial responses were observed in 4 of 29 (14%) patients with a variety of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma lasting 2.4, 2.4, 5.5, and 9.0 months. Just prior to treatment the responding patients had received and eventually become refractory to vincristine. These data show a lack of total cross-resistance between vinblastine and vincristine which might have important therapeutic implications in this disease.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Historically, vinblastine given by intravenous bolus injection has not been an effective treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas; vincristine has displayed greater activity. Also, vinblastine has generally been considered to be cross-resistant with vincristine in such patients. In an attempt to overcome these obstacles, a protracted infusion of vinblastine was administered (0.5-1.5 mg/m2 per day for 5 days) and repeated every 3 weeks. Partial responses were observed in 4 of 29 (14%) patients with a variety of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma lasting 2.4, 2.4, 5.5, and 9.0 months. Just prior to treatment the responding patients had received and eventually become refractory to vincristine. These data show a lack of total cross-resistance between vinblastine and vincristine which might have important therapeutic implications in this disease.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Historically, vinblastine given by intravenous bolus injection has not been an effective treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas; vincristine has displayed greater activity. Also, vinblastine has generally been considered to be cross-resistant with vincristine in such patients. In an attempt to overcome these obstacles, a protracted infusion of vinblastine was administered (0.5-1.5 mg/m2 per day for 5 days) and repeated every 3 weeks. Partial responses were observed in 4 of 29 (14%) patients with a variety of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma lasting 2.4, 2.4, 5.5, and 9.0 months. Just prior to treatment the responding patients had received and eventually become refractory to vincristine. These data show a lack of total cross-resistance between vinblastine and vincristine which might have important therapeutic implications in this disease.

Key concepts: Vinblastine, Vincristine, Medicine, Bolus (digestion), Lymphoma, Refractory (planetary science), Chemotherapy, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Vinblastine Infusion in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas: Lack of Total Cross-Resistance with Vincristine — Research Paper | ScholarLens