2014•Journal of academic language and learningOpen access

Rethinking what it means to write: A contribution from Judith Butler

Bárbara James

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Judith Butler’s performativity work is perhaps more comfortably situated within the areas of philosophy, feminist post structuralism and queer theory than it is within the more influential theoretical framings that inform Academic Language and Learning (ALL) practice and research in Australia. In this paper, I discuss the ways in which particular aspects of Judith Butler’s performativity might be brought into play to offer a theorised explanation of the complex and the fleeting aspects of student writing and drafting. To do this, I draw on data from a study of research student writing. Butler’s performativity work, that is, her work on the role that language plays in the processes of subject formation provokes a reconsideration of some of the possible unanticipated effects of academic language and learning practices, specifically text analysis. It goes some way towards theorising why it might appear that some students ‘just don’t get it!’

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Judith Butler’s performativity work is perhaps more comfortably situated within the areas of philosophy, feminist post structuralism and queer theory than it is within the more influential theoretical framings that inform Academic Language and Learning (ALL) practice and research in Australia. In this paper, I discuss the ways in which particular aspects of Judith Butler’s performativity might be brought into play to offer a theorised explanation of the complex and the fleeting aspects of student writing and drafting. To do this, I draw on data from a study of research student writing. Butler’s performativity work, that is, her work on the role that language plays in the processes of subject formation provokes a reconsideration of some of the possible unanticipated effects of academic language and learning practices, specifically text analysis. It goes some way towards theorising why it might appear that some students ‘just don’t get it!’

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Judith Butler’s performativity work is perhaps more comfortably situated within the areas of philosophy, feminist post structuralism and queer theory than it is within the more influential theoretical framings that inform Academic Language and Learning (ALL) practice and research in Australia. In this paper, I discuss the ways in which particular aspects of Judith Butler’s performativity might be brought into play to offer a theorised explanation of the complex and the fleeting aspects of student writing and drafting. To do this, I draw on data from a study of research student writing. Butler’s performativity work, that is, her work on the role that language plays in the processes of subject formation provokes a reconsideration of some of the possible unanticipated effects of academic language and learning practices, specifically text analysis. It goes some way towards theorising why it might appear that some students ‘just don’t get it!’

Key concepts: Performativity, Sociology, Situated, Queer theory, Subject (documents), Queer, Epistemology, Structuralism (philosophy of science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rethinking what it means to write: A contribution from Judith Butler — Research Paper | ScholarLens