A Note on Relativity Before Einstein
M. N. Macrossan
Abstract
M. N. Macrossan
Abstract
Keswani and Kilmister [1983] did not mention Larmor as one of the precur-sors of special relativity. The Lorentz transformations, written here in a form similar to that used by Poincare ́ [1905], x1 = `β−1 (x − vt) y1 = `y z1 = `z (1) t1 = `β−1 t − vx/c2) where β = (1 − v2/c2)1/2 and ` = 1, were first posited by Larmor [1897] although Voigt [1887] had studied these equations with ` = β. Since ` 6 = 1, Voigt’s equations do not form a group (Poincare ́ [1905]), and do not satisfy the principle of relativity. Larmor’s con-tribution is not well known perhaps because he derives the transformations in two steps and never sets them down in their modern form. His book (Larmor
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Keswani and Kilmister [1983] did not mention Larmor as one of the precur-sors of special relativity. The Lorentz transformations, written here in a form similar to that used by Poincare ́ [1905], x1 = `β−1 (x − vt) y1 = `y z1 = `z (1) t1 = `β−1 t − vx/c2) where β = (1 − v2/c2)1/2 and ` = 1, were first posited by Larmor [1897] although Voigt [1887] had studied these equations with ` = β. Since ` 6 = 1, Voigt’s equations do not form a group (Poincare ́ [1905]), and do not satisfy the principle of relativity. Larmor’s con-tribution is not well known perhaps because he derives the transformations in two steps and never sets them down in their modern form. His book (Larmor
Key concepts: Theory of relativity, Einstein, Epistemology, Theoretical physics, Philosophy, Physics, Mathematical physics